Page 124 - J. C. Turner - History and Science of Knots
P. 124

Inuit Knots                          113

         Inuit knotting, ethnographical and archaeological.  The methodology we wish
         to apply will be one derived from their combined approach, that is:

           1. A survey of  the records of  ethnographical observations in the literature.
              These sources, Sollas, Murdoch and Boas [30], [25], [3] commence rather
              late, i.e, from ca. 1880 and onwards.  This sudden ethnographical interest
              in the subject was due to the emerging realisation of  the importance of
              technology to the structure and functioning of  society, as ltnots can be
              seen as a rudimentary form of  technology.  However, lcnots seldom stand
              alone and are usually incorporated into more sophisticated constructions.
              Porsild discussed the construction and use of knots in a baleen sealing net
              [28], Ford showed a baleen net knot [lo], while Birket-Smith has described
              the incorporation of  knots in implements from the Egedesminde district
              121.

           2.  Accessible hard archaeological evidence in the form of  excavated ltnotted
              artifacts and  either  artifacts described  in  the literature or  available  at
              the National  Museums  of  Denmark and Great  Britain.  The oldest  set
              of  known  proper  ltnots  are those  excavated  at the  Saqqaq  settlement
              of  Qeqertasussuk  tucked  away  in  the southeastern corner  of  Dislto Bay
              in central west  Greenland  [15]. On the other hand, Karen  McCullough
              found knot samples from around A.D. 1000 during her Ruin Island project
              and on  which  she  reports  by  means  of  photographic illustrations  [24].
              Erik Holtved [22] described excavated Thule Inuit Knots from about 200
              years later.

         Excepting  some further  snippets, which  are few  and far  between,  the above
         mentioned cover almost  all currently accessible  ltnowledge about Inuit ltnots.
         Fortunately there remain the serendipitous sources.  H. C. Gull~v, from Den-
         mark's  National  Museum's  Etnografisk Samling in  Copenhagen, was  so ltind
         as to supply me with descriptions of  knots, which he had excavated at a site in
         the vicinity of Nuult and dated to be from A.D. 1700. Around 1985 G.Budworth
         surveyed  some ltnots on a Polar Inuit sledge, which is ltept at the Museum  of
         Manltind,  the ethnographical department  of  the British  Museum  in  London
         [7]. The sledge was brought  back by  Sir John Ross from his 1818 exploration
         to find the Northwest  Passage.  It represents a sample of  Polar ltnotting skills
         uninfluenced  by outsiders.  Jgrgen Meldgaard at Denmark's National Museum
         has informed  me  about material involving  ltnots from  A.D. 600  to appear in
         an In  Memoriam  paper  he  is  producing  on  Helge  Larsen's  excavation  of  an
         Ipiutak Inuit site in the western  part of  the arctic region.
             A  few  words  follow  on  the  kind  of  knots  we  shall  be  discussing.  The
         foregoing examples are all of  practically applied ltnotting, but lilte many other
   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129