Page 211 - J. C. Turner - History and Science of Knots
P. 211

200                     History and Science of Knots

          15, a `Right-handed' (Direct) Sheetbend (#1431) after 22, a Double Sheet-
          bend (#1434) after 36, a Carrick Bend (ends on the same side, #1428) after
          20, a Carrick Bend (ends opposite, #1439) after 70, an Overhand Bend (right-
          handed in left-handed yarn, #1558) after 23, or (left-handed in left-handed
          yarn, #1557) after 33, a Fisherman's Knot (#1414) after 43; a Ring Bend
          (#1412) withstood at least 100 cycles. Ashley called attention to the effects
          of handedness of knot and lay in the Overhand Bend and how the ends lead
          out in the Carrick Bend. He claimed that the security of a knot seemed to
          depend solely on the nip of the knot, the spot within a knot where the end is
          gripped and thereby made secure, and used as a major argument the behaviour
          of the Direct and Oblique Sheetbends. He said that the Direct Sheetbend has
          a good nip and does not slip easily, while the Oblique has a poor nip and
          is unreliable. Yet the one slipped at 22 cycles and the other at 15, which I
          should have thought not all that very different, and not all that good; and I
          can recognise no real difference in the nips of the two knots.
              Both Ashley [5, p. 16] and Day [16] denied what they called a common
          misconception, that to be secure, adjacent parts of a knot should tend to move
          under load in opposite directions. This does apply to a Reef Knot (not very
          secure) but not to many other, more secure, knots.
              Day [16] in the course of standard strength tests found the Oblique Sheet-
          bend insecure when tied in manila rope, but Chisnall [14], using a variety of
          more or less improvised tests, found that the Oblique form was more secure
          than the Direct when tied in Kernmantle and some braided ropes. He also [15]
          found that, using right-hand-laid rope, a Reef Knot tied with the first Half
          Knot left-handed ('left over right') was more secure than when the first Half
          Knot was right-handed.
              An interesting example of insecurity is found in the Figure Eight Bend
          (as [5, #1410], but using a Figure Eight Knot, [5, #524]). When subjected
          to a heavy load, the knot flypes, that is, turns `inside-out', perhaps several
          times if the working ends are long enough, before reaching the breaking point
          [6]. Because the knot is so little liable to jam in cracks or under ledges when
          the knotted rope is drawn over rock, some [6] think the knot has valuable
          applications; others [12] disagree, finding inadequate security.
              In many fields, natural fibres have been largely replaced by synthetics for
          rope. But many knots are less secure when tied with the synthetics; this has
          often necessitated the introduction of modified or new knots (see, for example,
          the climbers' knots discussed in Chapter 9). Monofilament nylon fishing lines
          are more slippery than gut; anglers have often met the problem by increasing
          the number of twists or turns in the knot. Thus the Blood Knot had 11 turns
          in gut [5, #2951 but 41 turns in nylon [11, p. 88]; the Water Knot and the
          Fisherman's Knot used single Overhands in gut [5, #296, 293] but multiple
   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216