Page 46 - MWG-011_Neat
P. 46

Shrichakradhar.com                                                                      43
               Trends in Urbanization: The Office of the Registrar General and Census Commissioner of India
               projected the urban population for the year 2011 at 358 million, and estimated that urban population
               growth rates would decline from 2.75 per cent per annum observed during 1991-2001 to 2.23 per cent
               per annum during 2001-2011 (Registrar General and Census Commissioner, 2006). Urban experts
               also believed that India’s urbanization would slow down because of its exclusionary nature and its
               inability to spur rural-to-urban migration. However, the 2011  Census showed some unexpected
               results. According to the 2011 Census, the urban population grew to 377 million showing a growth rate
               of 2.8 per cent per annum during 2001-2011. The level of  urbanization  in the country  as a whole
               increased from 27.9 per cent in 2001 to 31.2 per cent in 2011, an increase of 3.3 percentage points
               during the decade 2001-2011 compared to an increase of 2.2 percentage points during 1991-2001. It
               may be noted that the Indian economy had grown from about 6 per cent per annum during the 1990s
               to about 8 per cent during the first decade of the 2000s .This clearly reflects the power of economic
               growth in bringing about faster urbanization during 2001-2011.
               The urban-rural natural increase growth differentials remained almost constant (Four persons per
               population of 1,000) between the census period 1991-2000 and 2001-2010. Therefore, it is the net
               rural-urban classification and net rural-to-urban migration that are responsible for the higher urban
               rural growth differentials and the speeding up of urbanization during 2001- 2011.
               Issues of urbanization: The population of India in the urban areas is rising due to migration of
               people to urban  areas, due to lack of employment opportunities in rural areas and certain other
               reasons. Moreover, the population of metropolitan cities is rising at a much faster pace than that of
               other towns, adding a lot of socio-ecological problems.
                It is also well known that increasing urbanization and the growth of cities is closely associated with
               economic development, as judged  by most current interpretations of the term. According to the
               United Nations (2008  p.1), most of the population growth expected in urban areas will  be
               concentrated in cities and towns of less developed regions. Asia will experience the greatest increase in
               urban population of any geographical region. Its urban population is projected to rise by 1.8 billion.
               Even the number of large cities will increase considerably in the coming  decades.  An  increasing
               proportion of the world’s population level in mega cities (with a population of 10 million or more) and
               in cities with 5- 10 million inhabitants. In 2007, there were 19 megacities but by 2025, the number is
               expected to be 25; and most of these megacities were in Asia.
               Social Infrastructure: India’s eight biggest cities, all end up rated as average or a little worse, and
               there are few clear reasons why this is so. For starters, commuting is a problem area in every one of
               them. In some cases, this is because public transport infrastructure is absent and in others because
               traffic and parking woes make life a hell.
               Environment:  Another  problem area is the  broad category of ‘environment’. While weather  is
               something administrators can do nothing about, air quality emerged as a concern in every city, as did
               lack of open spaces and sporting facilities. This broad category plays an important role in deciding
               how people view the quality of life in their city.
               Physical and Civic  Infrastructure:  While physical infrastructure in terms of power and water
               supplies, for instance, has been beefed up, civic infrastructure – namely law and order; efficient and
               clean local administration remains something our citizens can only dream of.
               Quality of Life: In a period that has seen sustained high inflation rates, particularly in food, it comes
               as no surprise that cost  of living is a parameter on which every city ranked low. Predictability,
               residents of every city also said life was more stressed out than relaxed in their city.

               Q6. Discuss trends, reason and consequences of migration.
               Ans. Human migration is the movement of people from one place to another with the intentions of
               settling, permanently or temporarily, at a new location (geographic region). The movement is often
               over long distances and from one country to another, but internal migration is also possible; indeed,
               this is the dominant form globally. People may migrate as individuals, in family units or in large
               groups.
               Migration Trends and Projections: During the colonial period, Indians were described as highly
               immobile population. Low levels of education, lower capacity to deal with the uncertainty linked to
               migration, poor transport and communication facilities, traditional value systems and other social
               factors have often been pointed out as the cause for their low rate of migration. Kingsley Davis in his
               pioneering work “The Population of India and Pakistan” had  attributed this  immobility to the
               prevalence of caste system, joint families, practice of early marriage, diversity of language and culture,
               lack of education, and predominance of agriculture in the economy. He argued that a society bound by
               caste and family system and traditional values, often acts as a deterrent to migration.
               There are several demographers, however, who would not consider the migration rate as very low,
               notwithstanding the socio-cultural diversity in  the country. This is largely  due to  a high rate of
   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51