Page 817 - SUBSEC October 2017_Neat

DISCUSSION OF FINDINGS — ANALYSIS OF APPLICABLE LEGAL PRINCIPLES/DATA 6

The candidate:  Discussion is comprehensive, coherent, accounts for the 5-6
findings and makes links to existing law/legal theories
(a) interprets the findings and while outlining the impact of the limitations on the
explain how they relate to investigations.
existing body of
information  Discussion is a coherent, accounts of the findings and 3-4
relates them to the law/legal theories.
(b) recognises the limitations
of the investigation and it  Discussion accounts of the findings and relates them to 2
impact on the findings the law/legal theories but lack coherence.

(c) relates findings to the law  Discussion is limited and is not coherent. 1
and or legal theories

CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 4

The candidate presents  Conclusions are sound, plausible and based on the 3-4
conclusions that are based on findings of the research. Recommendations relate to the
the findings and make sound conclusion drawn.
recommendations.
 Conclusions are sound but are not entirely supported by 2
the findings of the research.

 Conclusions are flawed and not based on the findings of 1
the research.

REFERENCING 3

The candidate has prepared  Referencing is consistently and accurately done and 3
acknowledges all sources of bibliography is well organised, in appropriate format
information using an and includes all relevant details
internationally accepted
format.  Bibliography is fairly well organised, in appropriate 2
format and includes some relevant details

 Bibliography is poorly organised, format is not 1
appropriate

TOTAL 30

CXC A23/U2/17 37