Page 874 - SUBSEC October 2017_Neat
P. 874

02131020/CAPE/SPEC 2017

                                                            6

                              terms in respect to the judiciary as against the other arms
                              of the state.

                              Held:  “The principle of Separation of Powers was implicit
                              in  the  Constitution,  and  Parliament  had  no  power  to
                              transfer  from  the  Judiciary  to  the  Review  Board,  the
                              majority of whose members were not qualified to exercise
                              judicial powers, a discretion to determine the severity of
                              punishment  to  be  inflicted  on  an  individual  member  of  a
                              class of offenders, and accordingly, the provisions of ss.8
                              and  22  of  the  Gun  Court  Act  were  contrary  to  the
                              constitution  and  void  and  the  sentences  passed  on  the
                              defendant unlawful.”

                              Law:  Astaphan  v.  Controller  of  Customs  1966  (Court  of
                              Appeal of Dominica)

                              Section  6  of  the  Dominica  protects  individuals  from
                              compulsory       acquisition        of     his     property       without
                              constitutional authority.  The appellant was required to
                              pay  sums  in  excess  of  estimated  duties  on  goods  being
                              cleared from customs.

                              Separation of powers
                              Issue:  Whether  Legislature  of  Dominica  delegated  or
                              transferred  its  legislative  power  of  taxation  to  the
                              Executive  by  authorities  to  demand  a  tax  or  duty  under
                              s.27(4)of the Customs (Control and Management) Act

                              Held: Section 27 (4) inconsistent with basic principle of
                              separation  of  powers  and  therefore  unconstitutional  and
                              void to that extent.  It further sums that in nature of a
                              penalty this was a judicial power or discretion which could
                              not legislatively be transferred to the Executive.

                          Clear application of each of two laws 2 marks each   [4 marks]
                          Partial application 1 mark
                          Clear explanation of each case or example 2 marks each
                                                                                           [4 marks]
                          Application and Conclusion
                                Therefore a judge of the Child Court must be appointed
                                 by the Judicial Legal Services Commission and not the
                                 Minister of Justice.
                                Section 15 of the Child Court Act is unconstitutional
                                 because  it  vests  the  power  of  appointment  of  a  High
                                 Court Judge in the Ministry of Justice, a member of the
                                 Executive and Legislature rather than to the independent
                                 Judicial Legal Services Commission.

                          Application and Conclusion                                       [2 marks]
                          Coherence                                                         [3 marks]

                                                                                           [15 marks]
   869   870   871   872   873   874   875   876   877   878   879