Page 140 - Histories of City and State in the Persian Gulf_Neat
P. 140

120    Histories of City and State in the Persian Gulf

              independence of India. In matters of domestic policy, the British admin-
              istration gave precedence to the oil and security alliance with the new
              government. These concerns limited the scope of imperial intervention in
              the internal affairs of the islands to matters concerning extraterritorial
              jurisdiction, public order and, naturally, the oil industry.
                In ideological terms, a new focus on social advancement and welfare for
              the indigenous population supported, and to a certain extent provided a
              justification for, the new aims and objectives of informal empire. It also
              replaced the moral values of the ‘benevolent’ imperialism which had
              inspired the rhetoric of reform in the 1920s. Not only was the well-being
              of the natives a guarantee of public order, particularly after the Egyptian
              revolution of 1952 and the emergence of radical Arab nationalism, but it
              also fulfilled the moral imperatives which increasingly underpinned the
              British imperial enterprise in the Middle East in the era of decolonisation.
              Soon after World War II, the focus of the political discussion shifted from
              the suitability of supporting Bahrain’s modernisation to the entitlement of
              individuals to share the benefits of oil revenue. The debate on agriculture,
              which continued throughout the 1930s and 1940s, is quite indicative of
              this change of emphasis. For instance, the uncertain financial prospects of
              Bahrain in the early oil era raised concerns about the future diet of the
              population. As oil royalties exceeded customs receipts for the first time in
              1936, the British Agent continued to press for the resumption of the
              agricultural scheme, which had been abandoned in 1932 as a result of
              insufficient funds. 19
                As the unofficial agent of informal empire, Belgrave pursued his own
              rhetoric, often distancing himself from the different generations of British
              imperial administrators posted in Manama. Remarkably, during his long
              career on the payroll of the ruler of Bahrain his strong, but often rigid,
              sense of duty seldom created split loyalties in his role as broker between
              the agency, the ruler and the population. While displaying some of the
              patronising traits of the British agents, he embraced wholeheartedly the
              rhetoric of development before it became the established doctrine of
              the British imperial order in the 1940s. Since 1926, Belgrave advocated
              the emancipation of the local population along modern lines, a belief
              which stemmed from his daily contact with individuals from all walks of
              life as head of the Land Department, the Courts and the Police. In this
              sense, Belgrave’s ‘civilising mission’ was a personal undertaking rooted in
              his years of service in the Colonial Office before his arrival in Manama.
              Ultimately, however, the advisor remained part of the infrastructure of

              19
                Political Agent Bahrain to British Resident Bushehr, 17 November 1936, R/15/2/807
                IOR. On Bahrain’s agricultural development see al-Tajir, Bahrain 1920–1945, pp. 162–9.
   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145