Page 340 - Bahrain Gov annual reports(V)_Neat
P. 340

4
                      The political disturbances and incidents which took place during 1956 developed from
                   events which occurred during the previous two or three years but the Higher Executive Com­
                   mittee (H.E.C.) which was primarily responsible for these incidents was incited by propaganda
                   from Egypt and from Syria, by means of broadcasts, newspapers and direct personal contacts.
                   The H.E.C. was encouraged and emboldened by the belief, which grew steadily stronger, that
                   its actions were approved and supported by the British Government and this impression
                   deterred many of the responsible Arabs who supported the Government from indicating their
                   disapproved of the H.E.C.
                       In 1953 the age-old conflict between the Sunni and Shia sects flared up again, the Shias,
                   considering themselves ill-treated, resigned en masse from the Municipal Councils and their
                   leaders made various complaints to the Government about conditions in the markets, repre­
                   sentation of Shias on public bodies and absence of Shia judges in the courts. These matters
                   were under consideration when an event occurred which still further inflamed the feelings
                   between the seels. During the Shia religious procession on 10th Muharram, September 20th,
                   1953, disorder broke out and there was a light between Sunni spectators and Shia participants
                   in the procession, a number of people being injured. Both sides accused the other of instigating
                   the disturbance but an official enquiry revealed no grounds for this accusation. Next day a
                   Shia village was attacked by a mob of Sunni Arabs.
                       During the Spring of 1954 there were many incidents between Sunnis and Shias so the
                   Government appointed a committee consisting of two leading Shias and two Sunnis to do what
                   they could to ease the situation. It was this which perhaps gave rise to the idea that the Govern­
                   ment should appoint a permanent Council of Sunnis and Shias which later developed into a
                   demand by the H.E.C. for an elected Parliament.
                       In June 1954 there was a fight between Sunni and Shia oil company workers at the refinery
                   gates, Shias from the neighbouring villages joined in and many people were injured, one Sunni
                   Arab was killed. The people who were involved in the fight were tried and a number of them,
                   of both sects, were sentenced to varying terms of imprisonment. They were lodged in the fort.
                   After the case had been heard there was a mass meeting of Shias in a mosque opposite the fort.
                   Violent speeches were made and the crowd advanced on the fort with the intention of liberating
                    the Shia prisoners. They were ordered to disperse but did not do so, shots were fired and four
                   Shias were killed. Demonstrations and a strike of Shia workers followed this incident ; Shias
                   in the villages wishing to go back to work were intimidated from doing so by their leaders.

                       At this time a group of Sunnis with strong political leanings, some of them of Persian
                   origin, none of them being true Arabs, joined the more extreme Shia leaders with the ultimate
                   object of obtaining certain demands from the Government. A committee of eight members
                   was formed, four were Sunnis and four were Shias, they subsequently styled themselves “The
                    Higher Executive Committee.”
                       In September there was a strike of ’bus and taxi drivers in opposition to the Government’s
                   introduction of compulsory third-party insurance ; the strike was engineered by the H.E.C.
                   Finally the Government permitted the formation of a local insurance company which was, in
                   fact, run by the H.E.C.
                       After the drivers’ strike, which was accompanied by some disorder, the H.E.C. presented
                   a petition to the Government claiming that they represented the people of Bahrain and demand­
                   ing an elected Parliament, a Trades Union, a Law Code and new, foreign, judges in the Courts.
                       The H.E.C. was not recognised by His Highness as representing his subjects but he issued a
                   proclamation explaining that certain reforms were in the course of being carried out ; a Legal
                   Adviser had been appointed, a Labour Law was to be drafted and a Criminal Code was in
                   preparation. It was prepared in London and subsequently amended in Bahrain. He did not
                   agree to the demand for a Parliament.
                       The H.E.C. threatened to organise a strike if all that they demanded was not granted. A
                   strike took place which lasted for a week ; it was a peaceful, partial strike and there were no
                   incidents. After the strike His Highness appointed a committee of Sunnis and Shias to investi­
                   gate complaints and hear suggestions from the public about Education and Public Health. The
                   Committee produced a report which contained a certain number of useful recommendations,
                   among them the suggestion that there should be permanent Education and Public Health
                   committees. The H.E.C. tried unsuccessfully to boycott the work of this committee by pre­
                   venting people from appearing before it.
   335   336   337   338   339   340   341   342   343   344   345