Page 337 - Arabia the Gulf and the West
P. 337

334                            Arabia, the Gulf and the West



                         half of Libya’s oil exports, was highly vulnerable to the RCC’s chosen tactic of
                         imposing restrictions upon production as a means of forcing up prices. If the
                         independents could be made to yield, so the junta reasoned, the majors would
                         have to follow. Amoseas was ordered to reduce its production by 31 per cent in
                         June, Oasis by 12 per cent in July, Mobil/Gelsenberg (the West German oil
                         company) by 20 per cent in August, and finally Esso by 15 per cent in early
                         September.
                             It was largely the play of forces elsewhere which had both allowed and
                         encouraged Qaddafi to behave as boldly as he had. A rather mysterious ‘acci­
                         dent’ to the Syrian end of TAPline in May had cut off the flow of Saudi Arabian
                         oil to its Mediterranean terminal. Civil war broke out in Nigeria in the summer

                         over the attempted secession of Biafra, interrupting the supply of Nigerian oil.
                         A shortage of tankers, combined with a high demand for oil in Europe, drove
                         up the spot market prices for both oil and tankers. From the Libyans’ point of
                         view it was an excellent moment to force a renegotiation of the posted prices,
                         since the inflated rates for tanker charters could be used to raise the premium
                         paid for Libyan oil because of its lower transportation cost. Once the new
                         premium had been fixed, Qaddafi intended to compel the companies to con­
                         tinue paying it, regardless of whether or not tanker rates and transport costs
                         fell. For this very reason, and also because the other oil-producing countries
                         were bound to demand the same posted price as Libya achieved, the companies
                         were inclined to stand their ground and to put off all negotiations. While the
                         majors could afford to take this stand, having alternative sources of oil supplies
                         to fall back on should the going become rough, the independent producers

                         were without any such protection, and it was on them that the Libyan RCC
                         now concentrated its fire.
                            In the third week of August Occidental was instructed by Major Abdul
                         Salem Jallud, the deputy prime minister and Qaddafi’s right-hand man in the
                         RCC, to reduce its production further, from 485,000 to 425,000 b/d. Qaddafi
                         was clearly keeping a close eye on the Algerians, who in July had unilaterally
                         raised the posted price of Algerian oil by some 37 per cent. As a warning to the
                         French companies not to resist, the Algerians had at the same time nationalized
                         the assets of Shell, Phillips and Atlantic Richfield. With the first anniversary of
                         his own revolution approaching, Qaddafi was eager to show that he, too, could

                         triumph spectacularly over his Western adversaries. Occidental, whose
                         humiliation was obviously to be the piece de resistance of the celebratory games,
                         was caught in a trap. If it yielded to the Libyans and raised its posted price, it
                         ran the risk of pricing itself out of the European market, especially if tanker
                         rates for Persian Gulf crude were to drop as a consequence of the reopening 0
                         the Suez Canal, or for other reasons. On the other hand, if it stood up to e
                        junta and as a result was deprived of even more of its share of Libyan cru e, 1
                        would lose most of its European customers anyway. Earlierin the*um™^ ..
                        company had tried to persuade Esso to guarantee its supplies of crude, vi
   332   333   334   335   336   337   338   339   340   341   342