Page 340 - Gulf Precis(II)_Neat
P. 340

318           Part VIII—Chap. LXXVI.
                          616. Captain Honnoll in one par t of Lis letter did admit that with his own
                      looal oxporienpo and knowledge he might, by great personal exertion, carry on
                      tho dutios of the Residency without the aid of an Assistant, but he had on 6ome
                      ocoasions boon glad to avail himself of the assistance of officers, who happened
                      to he present in Karrak, in getting translations of letters made, and in general
                      considerations ho con sidered the appointment of an Assistant Resident in dis­
                      pensable.
                          617.  On this the Government of India yielded again, and did not objoot to
                      an Assistant being appointed (only however as a temporary arrangement) on
                      a salary of B700 a month. Lieutenant Kemball was appointed accordingly,
                      and ho held the appointment up to tho year 1853.
                          618.  In their letter. No. 82, dated 1853, tho Bombay Government
                      informed tho Government of India that Lieutenant-Colonel Honnoll having
                      applied for a furlough to Europe, they had, subject to the Government of
                      India’s approval, appointed Captain #. Kemball to succeed him as Resident
                      in the Persian Gulf. As to the abolition of the office of the Assistant
                      Resident, ordered by tho Government of India, the Bombay Government invited
                      their attention to the previous correspondence on tho subject, and observed : —
                         “The offiocs of Politioal Agent in Turkish Arabia, and of Resident in tho Persian Gulf,
                      are, as has been shown on tbc occasion of Lieutenant-Colonel Rayvlinson'a recent absence in
                      Europe, dependant on tho appointment of the Assistant to tho Rcsidont, for a qualified officer
                      as a locum tenons, in case of any sudden emergency ; for this, and the other reasons enume­
                     rated in the letters from this Government abovo mentioned, tho Right Honourable the
                      Governor in Council is of opinion that it will be injurious to the public interests if the
                     appointment of assistant be abolished. This Government therefore trusts that the Govern­
                     ment of India will give the subject its favorable consideration.”
                     ^ 619. The Government of Indm^approved of the proposals of the Bombay
   335   336   337   338   339   340   341   342   343   344