Page 187 - Arabian Studies (V)
P. 187

Women’s Inheritance of Land in Highland Yemen         175

         consolidation of family property under a leading individual was
          probably as important in the establishment of his base of power
         among the great urban families,as among cultivators. On the other
          hand, not being mere husbandmen, these families could rather
          more easily re-distribute title to land at various intervals, and their
          women could own land farmed by sharecroppers, remaining aloof
          from the problems of a woman directing cultivation in an area of
          traditionally predominantly male farming. For this reason, and
          bearing in mind the difficulty for the poor or those with little land
          were a woman to inherit a slice of an already tiny pie, one divisible
         only with hardship, one has every reason to be sceptical of a clear
         cut, rule-like distinction between the practices of one group
          following tribal custom and one Islamic law in this regard. To a
         certain extent the distinction between Islamic and tribal practices
          may always have been the difference between what is possible for
         the rich and what for the poor, between what is possible for
          merchants and what for farmers. Their ideals may not have been so
          entirely different.
            Such a suggestion in no way conforms to what older Islamic
          tradition (exemplified by the document discussed below) had to say
          on this subject. This tradition distinguishes between one group
          among which Islamic laws were enforced and another which
          resisted these laws. In the first case, the alienation of a woman’s
          inheritance constitutes an individual case of abuse; in the second,
          the alienation is evidence of a general local custom refusing women
          a part in the family estate. This tradition views the Qur’anic injunc­
          tions (and their exposition in texts of fara’id) as a positive innova­
          tion of God’s law that must be enforced by Islamic authority.19 In
          this view the fact that some women inherited real property in a
          farming area close to San‘a’ was the result of the area having long
          been subject to the influence of Islamic law and legal personnel
          from the city. This argument implies that in more isolated areas,
          still untouched by the forces of urbanization old or new (‘where
         gabilis are still g a bills') women would not inherit.
            Much of traditional Islamic analysis of society is built about the
          implicit opposition of an idealised tribal pastoralism with an
          equally idealised Islamic urbanism, thereby glossing over the
          complexities of the greatest part of society, the farming areas. It is
          indeed among pastoralists that women are likely to have least claim
          on land or flocks through inheritance and where a division of
          classes of property according to sex is likely to be most strongly
          marked, though detailed studies may reveal that even among
          pastoralists, a woman does have some claim on her father’s estate
          after marriage.20 As we have seen, in farming communities as well,
   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192