Page 187 - The Art & Architecture of the Ancient Orient_Neat
P. 187

PART TWO: THE PERIPHERAL
                                                                               REGIONS
                                                                          msmm
                                                              K /<







                                             jal               ?!
                                      a**''
                                    W>’.'  i:
                                            Figure 72. Two sides of carved ivory rod, from Megiddo

                         female sphinx may have been invented as a counterpart to the male sphinx rendering
                         Pharaoh. However this may be, the Megiddo panel cannot be quoted in support of the
                         Syrian origin of the creature, for such details as the vase it holds and the mat upon which
                        it rests prove that it follows an Egyptian prototype as closely as the Bes and Anubis
                        panels, hi view of its possible introduction in Egypt in the Amarna Period, it is possible
                        that the Megiddo ivory belongs to the fourteenth century. 102
             /             hi figure 72 an Egyptian theme is treated more freely. The object was probably part
                        of a piece of furniture - perhaps the support of an arm-rest. On three sides it shows a
                        traditional theme - herbivores and Hons, but at die right-hand top we meet the kneeling
                        bow-man from Ala$a Hiiyiik who is also common on Middle Assyrian seals and on
                        Syro-Hittite rchefs of the first millennium. Some calves or fawns show the ‘ folded poses*
                        characteristic of the Aegean animal style103 and other vivid attitudes. The fourth side has
                        three figures one above the other. The outer ones are beardless, and therefore gods rather
                        than princes, wearing the tall felt cap and a homed crown respectively.104 The middle
                        figure is a travesty of Pharaoh, or of Osiris, who wears the Atef crown with the royal
                        cobra, and the shepherd’s crook, which was an ancient attribute of Egyptian royalty.
                          But secular subjects too were rendered in a manner derived from Egypt. Four narrow
                        strips of ivory, with dovetailed ends, which went round a shallow box or the top of a
                        small table or stool, show scenes of which we reproduce two (Figures 73 and 74). hi the
                        chariot-battle the horses throw up their forelegs according to the Egyptian convention,
                        and in another piece a tame Hon is shown trotting along with the ruler’s chariot, as it
                        does in some representations of Pharaoh.105 Yet the charioteers, unHke those depicted in
                        either Egypt or Mesopotamia, do not stand upright, but bend forward, riding their Hght
                        vehicles like jockeys standing in the stirrups. The sprawHng figures of the slam, at right
                        angles to the chariots, again recall the conventions of Egyptian battle and hunting scenes.
                        A second piece shows the orderly march of chariots and infantry,106 a third the convey-





                                                                         fgaji                 la  c?



                                             and 74. Chariot battle and feast, on ivory inlays from Megiddo
                                    Figures 73
                                                                158
   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192