Page 51 - Su'udi Relations with Eastern Arabi & Uman (1800-1870)
P. 51

place of veneration and was visited frequently by the inhabitants of al-SIr.
        However, it was razed when the region completely acknowledged Su'udI
        authority.313
          The conversion of some of the tribes and the deputation of al-Dir‘Iyah
        representatives in the area marked the first step in the Su‘udl expansion along
        the coast of ‘Uman, and traditional tribal warfare enhanced the Su‘udl position
        in the following years. However, it was not until Salim b. Bilal al-Harq took
        command of the Su‘udi forces in southeastern Arabia that the Dirilyah
        expansionist plan really began to materialize. Leading a large Su'udI
        detachment mounted on horses and camels and supported by loyal elements of
        the Zahirah tribes, al-Harq penetrated the Burayml region and established a
        fortified settlement there.314 The Burayml town became a centre from which
        al-Harq directed his military operations towards both the territories of the
        Sultanate of Masqat and the unconverted remainder of the coastal tribes.315
        While in al-Burayml, al-Harq succeeded in establishing his supremacy over
        the greater part of the coast. In trying to win the rulers of Ra’s al-Khaymah
        over to his side, al-Harq employed tactics of personal contact and persuasion.
        He despatched a delegation composed of members of the Nu‘aym tribe to
        explain to the shaykhs of Ra’s al-Khaymah the doctrines of the reform, while
        urging them to cooperate with the Dir‘Iyah authority.316 When they rejected
        his offer and showed their resistance, al-Harq resorted to arms, despatching a
        contingent of two hundred cavalrymen accompanied by a force of five hundred
        men of the Nu‘aym tribe. Marching towards Ra’s al-Khaymah, the army
        stationed itself in the date-cultivating area between the town and al-Basatln,
        thus cutting off Ra’s al-Khaymah’s communication with other localities.317
        After a ten-day siege, the inhabitants of die town were able to force the    I
        invading army to retreat but did not have sufficient strength to pursue them
        further. Later, al-Harq and the Su‘udl detachment returned with a fresh
        reinforcement of elements from tribes allied to the Su'udls and surrounded
        Ra’s al-Khaymah for over two weeks.318 The Qawasim subsequendy
        submitted peacefully to the reformed doctrines, swore fidelity to their laws and
        injunctions, and fully acknowledged Su‘udl supremacy. 319
          Being not only Sunnis but Han balls as well, the Qawasim enthusiasrically
        adopted the principle of jihad, which appealed to their warlike instinct and
        perpetuated their habit of waging navi aggression against others in the
        Gulf.320 Furthermore, the Qawasim found in the Su‘udl alliance the strength
        to menace their traditional foe, the ruler of Masqat, discouraging his repeated
        attempts to gain control of some of their dependencies. Despite the strength of
        Su‘udl influence on the coast, the Qawasim remained masters in their own
        land. Recognirion of the Dir‘Iyah authority was acknowledged by the presence
        of Najdl preachers, who could make frequent visits to the country or else stay
        there permanently to supervise religious affairs, teach reformed precepts, and
        serve as well as informers on developments in the area.321 The annual zakdh
        was also to be remitted to al-Dir‘Iyah. Furthermore, the fifth portion of all
        spoils was to be delivered to the overlord, although not all of the coastal
        inhabitants observed these practices from the beginning. Some of them,
        especially those living in Lingeh on the Persian side of the Gulf, did not
        conform with this Su^dl-Wahhabi practice until some years later.322
        Nevertheless, they continued to comply with Su‘udl commands whenever it
        was demanded of them. In 1803, for example, they campaigned against the

                                       47
   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56