Page 217 - Arabiab Studies (IV)
P. 217

The Omani Manuscript Collection at Muscat              207

       ’1-Mu’thir (grandson of W.36), both of whom had originally
       dissociated from Musa and Rashid until they saw the consequen­
       ces of maintaining such an extreme position.
         There then follows accounts of the excellence of the Nizwa
       party’s two ‘neutral’ Imams, Sa‘Id b. ‘Abdullah (W.40d) and
       Rashid b. Walld. But after Rashid was killed the country fell into
       chaos; ‘no one was safe in Oman from its borderlands in Jurafar
       (Julfar) to Raghwan, whether living on the barren mountains or in
       the territory of the Huddan, or Rustaq’, and the people of learning
       and precedence died out.
         On this sombre note part one of the book finishes; it will be
       noted, that A. SaTd carefully omits all references to the views of his
       own contemporaries propagating the extreme Rustaq dogma (i.e.
       Ibn Barakah and A. ’l-ftasan al-BisyawI).
         The argument of the second part basically runs as follows. If we
       look at this old dispute there is certainly no doubt that Musa’s
       party had the support of some of the most worthy ‘u/a/na’ of his
       time. Since we cannot know anything new about the facts and
       since the views of worthy men conflict over this issue the only
       rightful position is to abstain. Instead of keeping the old wounds
       open we should try and heal them by striving to restore the true
       unified Imamate of which here are the details ... (next 40 or so
       tabs).
         Unfortunately A. Sa‘Id’s call to reason was not heeded, with the
       consequence that another half-millennium was to lapse before a
       unified Ibadi state was re-created in Oman.




                                 Notes
         1.  Ennami, A. K., ‘Studies in Ibadism’ Ph.D. thesis, Cambridge. 1971.
         2.  Wilkinson, J. C., ‘The Ibadi Imama’, B.S.O.A.S., London, 1976,
       XXXIX.
         3.  For a somewhat different approach to the early development of the
       Ibadi movement in Basra from that taken by such writers as Ennami
       (op.cit), Lewicki, T. in E.1.2 art. al-lbafjiyya and al-tfarithl. Salim b.
       Hamad, al-'Uqud al-fi<j(jiyyah fi Usui al-lbUdiyyah (D;lr al-Yaq?ah press,
       Beirut, 1974?), see the writer’s paper ‘The early development of the Ibadi
       movement in Basra’ in The formative period of Islamic history (600- 750)
       ed. Juynboll, G. H. A., (in preparation).
         4.  That is within the Dar al-Isl&m\ the main campaigns against the I Mr
       al-Uarb were directed at Hind.
         5.  J. of Oman Studies I (1976).       ,
         6.  Water and Tribal Settlement in South-East Arabia, Oxford, W77.
   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222