Page 181 - The Arabian Gulf States_Neat
P. 181

THE PRESENT LEGAL POSITION                119
           Having clarified the position of British protected States in a war in
         which the United Kingdom is a party, it can now be stated, in answer
         to the question asked at the beginning of this discussion regarding the
         position of the Shaikhdoms in a British war, that these Shaikhdoms
         arc, most probably, not involved in a war as a direct result of a
         declaration of war on the part of the United Kingdom. The practice
         in the last war had shown that these Shaikhdoms were, for all practical
         purposes, not placed at war with Germany as a result of the British
         declaration of war of 3 September 1939 against Germany.1 During the
         period of the war no specific mention of the Shaikhdoms being placed
         at war with Germany was ever made. However, according to The
         Times, the Rulers of the Shaikhdoms sent messages of support and
         sympathy to Her Majesty's Government in the United Kingdom.2
         It may be argued that the Rulers of the Shaikhdoms had, by sending
         messages of sympathy to the British Government, declared themselves,
         though informally, as enemies of Germany.3

         2. Do the Gulf States have the right to declare war against the British
         Government or against Third States?
           (i) Muscat
         Having stated above that Muscat is an independent State with full
         international personality, it would seem to follow, therefore, that her
         sovereign right of making war or peace with any other State, including
         the United Kingdom, has remained in full force. Muscat has not, in
         law, curtailed or surrendered this right, and she is therefore respon­
         sible for her own international delinquencies. Consequently, it follows
         that a conflict between Muscat and any other independent State, in­
         cluding the United Kingdom, would most probably be regarded as
         ‘an international conflict’ to which the provisions of the Geneva
         Convention Relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War of 12 Aug­
         ust 1949 apply without condition.1 Although Muscat is not a party to
           1 For the Announcement from the Privy Council Office regarding British
         declaration of war against Germany on 3 September 1939, see The Times, 4 Sep­
         tember 1939.
           2 The Times, 11 September 1939.
           3 For a general statement regarding the Shaikh of Bahrain’s support to the
         British cause during the war, see Bahrain Government, Annual Report (1358),
         February 1939-Fcbruary 1940, p. 1.
           It may be remarked in this connection, that by the Persian Gulf States (Emer­
         gency) Order in Council, 1939, the Trading with the Enemy Act, 1939, was applied,
         ‘with certain modifications’, to the Gulf States, within the limits of Her Majesty’s
         jurisdiction therein. The Order of 1939 was later revoked by the Persian Gulf
         States (Emergency) (Revocation) Order, 1953. For these enactments, see 2 & 3
         Geo. 6. C. 89; S.R. & O. 1939/1293; S.I. 1953 No. 1670; Persian Gulf Gazette,
         Suppl. No. 2, 1 January 1945.
           4 Treaty Scries, Misc., No. 4 (1950), Cmd. 8033, p. 44.
   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186