Page 407 - The Arabian Gulf States_Neat
P. 407

X.*
                                                                                    i



                 IRAN’S OCCUPATION OF ABU MUSA AND THE TUNBS.   341
        could not protect them if agreement was not reached by the time of
        withdrawal’ V
          After the above discussion of the question, the Somali
        representative reminded the Security Council that “in the matter
        under consideration, it acts in accordance with the provisions of the
        Charter concerning the peaceful settlement of disputes”. (Art. 36,
        paragraph 1).
          On that basis, he suggested “that the Council should allow time
        for quiet diplomacy to work”. And since no objection was made to
        this suggestion, the President “declared that the Council would
        defer consideration of the question in order to allow sufficient time
        for third-party efforts to work”.2
        The Merits of Iran's Claim to Abu Musa and the Tunb Islands

          On 16 February 1971, the Shah of Iran was reported to have
        stressed his Government’s intention to occupy the three islands “by
        force if necessary”, if no peaceful arrangements for the handing             i
        over of the islands to Iran were made before British military
        withdrawal from the Gulf at the end of that year.3 Similarly, Iranian
        Prime Minister, Mr. Hoveida, and the former Foreign Minister, Mr.
        Zahedi, were reported to have asserted Iran’s sovereignty over the           ;
        said islands.                                                                i
          The Iranian Foreign Minister, Mr. Abbas Khalatbari, who
        succeeded Mr. Zahedi, reiterated Iran’s title to the islands on 10
        November 1971. He was reported as saying that Iran’s “sovereignty
        over the islands was not negotiable ’ ’, and that Iran “would insist on
        her right to the islands when the British left the Gulf, and that she
        had rejected Arab suggestions that Abu Musa and the Tunbs should
        be leased to Iran when Britain left the area”.4
          The argument presented by the Government of Iran in support of
        its sovereignty over the three islands was stated as follows:
          1. The islands were owned by Iran before they were occupied by
        Britain 150 years ago “on the assumption that they were essential to         ;
        combat piracy” in the Gulf. Consequently, “in pursuit of its
        imperial interests,Great Britain considered the islands as belonging         £
        to the Arab Shaiks of the Trucial States”. This de facto
        administration of the islands by Sharjah and Ras al Khaimah was              :
                                                                                     i
        1.  Ibid. p. 77.                                                             :
        2.  Ibid.
        3.  See Churba, Joseph, Conflict and Tension Among the States of the Persian Gulf,
            Oman and South Arabia, (Published by Air University Documentary Research
            Study, Alabama, December 1971, p. 41.
        4.  Arab Report & Record, op. cit. (1970), p. 684 (1971), p. 502; Keesing’s, op. cit. p.
            25010A.

                                                                                      i
   402   403   404   405   406   407   408   409   410   411   412