Page 104 - Life & Land Use on the Bahrain Islands (Curtis E Larsen)
P. 104

-80-




                       evidence for a central-place influence, which relegated the south coast to a
                       hinterland relationship with the north coast settlements and Qala'at al-Bahrain.
                                While it would be desirable to demonstrate this relationship quantitatively
                        through a hierarchy of size-ranked settlements, these archeological settlement
                        data were not recorded in early surface surveys. It is clear, however, that the
                        Barbar period population-distance relationship between tomb clusters is similar to
                        the modern pattern shown in Figure 2. Given this commonly observed pattern of
                        population distribution and projecting it into the past, the greatest number of
                        Barbar period villages would have been similarly clustered along the north coast of
                        Bahrain and located near springs. Pending a suitable palynological study to
                        indicate the contemporary domesticated plant species, it is helpful to view the
                        major Barbar period land-use zones as related to date and cereal cultivation. The
                        modern agricultural pattern shows vegetables intercropped with dates in gardens
                       along the north coast. Such crops requiring frequent care are grown in close
                       proximity to the central market, while more durable crops are produced in outlying
                       areas. The Barbar period, by analogy, may have displayed a similar pattern. Here
                       again, herding probably took place along the periphery of the cultivated areas
                       where competition for land was less severe.
                                The end of the Barbar period on Bahrain was quite sudden. The last
                       temple at Barbar was razed without further attempt at reconstruction. The break
                       in the ceramic sequence at Qala’at al-Bahrain is also abrupt; Barbar n levels are
                       often overlain by Hellenistic and later occupations,   Yet, we know that the
                       immediate successor to the Barbar period was the of Kassite Dynasty of
                       Mesopotamia. At Qala’at al-Bahrain the Kassite buildings, dated to the late second
                       millennium, overlie the Barbar sequence, which dates to little later than the
                       Isin-Larsa period. Thus, there was a hiatus in occupation at the Qalat. At least
                       four hundred years of settlement are unaccounted for in the archeological
                       sequence.  The distinctive ceramic forms of the Kassite period, however, help to
                       define what little is known of the late second millennium on Bahrain.
                                Only two Kassite period occupation sites are known. These are Qala’at
                       al-Bahrain and Barbar village (site 203). Other evidence comes solely from burials.
                       Both occupation sites are located less than 1 km inland from the north coast while
   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109