Page 134 - Life & Land Use on the Bahrain Islands (Curtis E Larsen)
P. 134

-110-




                         competition between caravan and sea trade during the Parthian period can be seen
                         as an influence on Gulf trade. Thus, Roman and Byzantine efforts to circumvent
                         Parthian and early Sasanian controlled caravan routes to the Far East through use
                         of the Red Sea maritime route may have contributed to an avoidance of the
                         Arabian Gulf at times when Palmyrene overland trade through Charax  was
                         restricted. Reuse of the gulf by long distance trading forces only reinitiated the
                         entrepot condition.



                                                           Limitations
                         Tbe qualitative model presented here ignores, in part, the various important
                         subsystems that Renfrew includes as necessary for analysis of a culture.
                         Subsistence and social subsystems are handled in only a general manner.
                         Technological and symbolic subsystems are not addressed. This is due partially to
                         intent and partially to a lack of reasonable data. Ttie intent has been to point to
                         the obvious subsystem, that of trade and communications, and display its force as
                         an explanatory device for the observed phenomena. This simplistic model
                         underlines what appears to be the obvious in discussions of Bahrain’s history and
                         archeology. Among the various factors that influenced Bahrain, maritime trade is
                         invariably held paramount. No assessment has been attempted for the more
                         mundane archeological evidence from other parts of the islands. One such topic is
                         land use. It is too simple to see the dynamics of Bahrain relegated to a single trade
                         subsystem when others should be considered. Yet, external trade is undeniably an
                         important factor. For the sake of completeness, anomalies must occur in the
                         external trade model.
                                  Tbe most striking contradictions are found during the first millennium
                         A.D. Historic and archeological evidence from other parts of the Gulf region argue
                         that the Sasanian Empire maintained one of the most widespread and well
                         conceived maritime networks in history, connecting Persia with India, Ceylon, and
                         the Far East. Whitehouse and Williamson (1973) display archeological evidence for
                         this trade in the form of Indian ceramic forms at various Sasanian sites along the
                         Persian coast.  These same forms have not yet been reported from Bahrain,
   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139