Page 62 - Life & Land Use on the Bahrain Islands (Curtis E Larsen)
P. 62

-38-




                                     Obviously, Telmun has lost contact with the mining
                               centers of Makkan and with these regions which supplied it
                               with stone and timber, etc. Some time between the fall of the
                               Dynasty of Larsa and the decline of power of the Hammurabi
                               Dynasty, it turned again into an island famous only for its
                              agricultural products, its sweet water, etc. Copper, precious
                              stones, and rare woods had now to come to southern
                               Mesopotamia either over the mountain ranges or from the
                               west along the river routes.[Oppenheim 1954:15]

                               Bibby (1971) has characterized the weight of the historic data on the
                      Dilmun problem by suggesting that the merchants of Ur were a highly pragmatic
                      group concerned with a return on their investments. They were not sending their
                      capital on voyages to a mystical land beyond the edge of the known world. Dilmun
                      was a reality (Bibby 1971:147).
                               This interpretation should be seen as part of a larger pattern. For
                      example, Oppenheim suggested that the frequency and intensity of direct contacts
                      by sea between Mesopotamia and Meluhha had reached a peak during the Akkadian
                      period. He felt that the maritime trade of the Ur III and Isin-Larsa dynasties was
                      only a second stage of development concomitant with the wane of maritime trade
                      expansion from the East. By the close of the third millennium, Dilmun was far
                      from being a mythical land. On the contrary, it had become a cultural center
                      which made use of its geographic position and port facilities to bind together the
                      extremities of a shrinking and fragmented trading system.
                              Perhaps it is not surprising to find that the ceramic indicators of third
                      millennium Bahrain in Appendix I parallel gulf trade. The ceramic sequence at
                      Qala'at al-Bahrain gives no firm indication of being earlier than Akkadian or late
                      Early Dynastic HI.    This applies to the record of third-millennium surface
                      collections as well. We are hard-pressed to recognize evidence of early third
                      millennium occupations even though these may have occurred on some part of the
                      island. A single Jemdet Nasr sherd from Temple I at Barbar is thus far the only
                      clue to this possibility. The ceramic evidence indicates the following pattern:


















                                                                                                      i
   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67