Page 238 - Gulf Precis (III)_Neat
P. 238

6a

                                                 CHAPTER VII.
                         Reception of fugitive slaves on board Her Majesty’s ships of war
                                             and other British vessels.

                             117. This question has formed the subject of considerable correspondence
                                                      in our records, and one of the first
                            Poli'ical A., January 1874. N01. q3-io7.  .   .       cases was
                                                      the action taken by His Majesty’s ship
                         Magpie. Then there was the case of Hugh Hose. Both these cases were
                         referred to in the discussion that took place in the third case in which the
                         May Frere gave protection to a slave, and we proposed to review the correspond­
                         ence in the two previous cases in connection with the last.
                             118.  On the night of the 31st August 1873, as the May Frere was lying at
                         anchor near the uninhabited island of Zairkoo, a slave, named Joah, swam off
                         from one of the 73 pearl-fishing boats lying near aud claimed protection. Major
                         Grant, the First Assistant Political Resident, happened to be on the vessel, and
                         gave his opinion that the man, having once been admitted on board, was entitled
                         to the protection he claimed. On learning this all the pearl boats weighed from
                         their anchorage in fear as we had discovered there were slaves on board them :
                         thereupon the Commander of the May Frere weighed to enable the pearl boats
                         to return to their fishing. In reporting the case Commander Guthrie remarked
                         that the maritime truce had been so effectual that no ship had been sent specially
                         to the pearl banks for years—
                         "but should the Trucial Chiefs fear a breach among themselves, and require the presence
                         of a ship of war, it would be rather awkward if the cruisers found out that one-third of the
                         boat's crews were slaves, and if he seized them on account of the head money he would be
                         entitled to for them, quoting as precedent May Frere carried a slave away from the pearl
                         banks and he was not given up.”
                             119.  Major Grant stated that his opinion was founded, not on any definite
                         instruction he had received, but on the precedent established by Colonel Pelly in
                         the case of three slaves who swam from shore to the Hugh Rose on or about the
                         15th August 1872, on which occasion Colonel Pelly instructed the commanding
                         officer not to give up the slaves, although their restoration was demanded by
                         their masters and the ship was lying in a Persian port: the slaves were taken to
                         Major Grant at Bahrein, who, under instructions from Colonel Pelly, sent them to
                         the Commissioner of Police in Bombay.
                            120.  Major Grant suggested that in the present state of the slave-trade
                        question, it would be satisfactory to have some definite instructions from Govern­
                         ment as to what class of slaves are entitled to receive protection on board British
                        ships, as in both the cases mentioned the slaves who received protection seemed
                        undoubtedly to come under the head of domestic slaves, and if domestic slaves
                        were allowed to receive protection on board every English ship the owners would
                        be great losers and the pearl fishing would come to a standstill as nearly all the
                        divers belonged to that class.
                            121.  Colonel Ross thought Major Grant was right not to surrender the
                        slave, and told him so, adding that commanders of Government vessels should
                        be so far as possible dissuaded from receiving domestic slaves on board their
                        vessels.
                            122. Colonel Ross referred to the correspondence of 1871, in July of which
                        year Colonel Pelly sought instructions from the Bombay Government for his
                        guidance in such cases. On that occasion two slaves had introduced themselves
                        on board the Magpie when at anchor in the inner roads of Bushire, and Colonel
                        Pelly received two letters of reclamation, one from the Persian Slave Commis­
                         sioner and the other from a British protected subject at Bushire. As one slave
                        appeared to be the property of a Persian subject, and Colonel Pelly considered
                             .   ,..   . ,   .   ,   . , that under the terms of the document
                                                       marginally noted we were precluded by
                         yV*i#Md ?h March*'?“ XUI °l T'eaty of positive agreement from interfering directly
                         iuis,    .>u.ciuUj/.         or indirectly with slaves the property of
                         Persians found within the territorial waters of Persia, he transferred the slave to
   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243