Page 200 - The Origins of the United Arab Emirates_Neat
P. 200

I (>()         The Origins of the United Arab Emirates
                together with K. 15. ‘Abel al-Razzaq (who was later to succeed
                him as Residency Agent), went ashore to summon Hamad to the
                ship. At first, Hamad sent word to Pridcaux to meet him    on
                shore, refusing to go on board the Lawrence. Later, he changed
                his mind and asked for a letter of safe conduct before he boarded
                the vessel. When this was issued, lie changed his mind yet again,
                categorically refusing to board the ship and declaring himself willing
                to pay a fine for the abduction of the slave. Pridcaux was greatly
                concerned at these insults to British prestige: Hamad had deliberately
                ignored the signal (the raising of the Resident’s Hag) to go on
                board; and lie had flouted the regulations about the slave trade.
                Pridcaux was convinced that, if Hamad’s disregard of the treaties
                with Britain should go unpunished, the Political Resident would
                gradually lose control of the villages of' the Shimayliyyah.6 The
                least of Pridcaux’s concerns was Fujairah’s wish to secede from
                Sharjah.
                  The Resident consulted the Senior Naval Officer, who was at
                Muscat on HMS Triad; HMS Cyclamen was also not far away.
                Together the two men decided, after obtaining the requisite permis­
                sion from the Naval Commandcr-in-Chief, on a suitable form of
                punishment: Hamad's fort would be bombarded and, if necessary,
                his property would be seized. The headman of Fujairah was given
                three hours notice to obey Pridcaux, failing which his fort would
                be fired on. Hamad refused to acknowledge the ultimatum, and
                accordingly the seaward faces of three of his towers were destroyed
                by shell-fire on 20 April. Although Pridcaux claimed ‘there was
                no loss of life directly caused by the bombardment’, he admitted
                that a report reached him that a slave in the fort had been
               severely wounded, and that Hamad’s daughter-in-law, ill to begin
                with, had died while being transported out of the fort.7 But Hamad
               suffered further chastisement. One of his dhows, said to be worth
                10,000 rupees, was seized by the Cyclamen and the Triad in Khawr
               Fakkan and released only when he agreed to pay a fine of 1200
               rupees for having enslaved the Baluchi girl,8 plus 300 rupees because
               his men in Gharayfah had refused to help launch a boat of the
               Lawrence that had turned broadside on 19 April.
                 The next and last time this violent form of punishment was
               meted out was in 1930, when Shaykh Sultan bin Salim of Ras
               al-Khaimah refused to give the RAF permission to base a petrol
               barge in his shaykhdom; the pearling fleet of Ras al-Khaimah
               was then seized, after which Sultan capitulated. Although the next
               decade saw the establishment by Britain of the imperial air-route
               and its securing of oil concessions for Petroleum Concessions Ltd,
               bombardment was never used again to enforce its authority in
  !            the area. British commitments and involvements in the Arab world
               had bv then become so embroiled, especially as regards Palestine,
   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205