Page 50 - The Origins of the United Arab Emirates_Neat
P. 50

26
                           The Origins of I he United Arab Emirates

            theeBritish c “rreSPO"dCnC?, Wi'h °lhcr coumrics except through
            r . •       * vernmcni, and not to permit the residence of mv
            to^cedc^sdl1 n^mo ^ B"Ush conscnl; lhcV a,so undertook not
            exeem ,o mLr- . r?agC a"V part °f thcir respective territories
            except t° the British Government. These agreements had the ellcet
            ^flairs'that lh.C. au.lho?ly of l|?c rulers in any of their internal
            fe,, r nK ,m|,1?*e 0,1 r°rciSn relations. In 1899, following
            cats of an Ottoman advance, coupled with rumours of a Russian
            c aim to an outlet for a Meditcrrancan-to-Kuwait railway,29   an
            agreement was signed with Kuwait.30 In it, the ruler, Mubarak
            bin oabah Al-Sabah, undertook not to permit entry to the representa­
            tives of any foreign powers and not to cede, sell, lease, mortgage
            01 give foi occupation any part of his land to a foreign power
            without the previous sanction of the British Government. In  1900
            he agreed to suppress the arms trade,31 and in 1904 to accept
            the establishment of a British post office in Kuwait.32 In 1914,
            Kuwait was recognised as ‘an independent Government under British
            protection \33
              Thus, by the outbreak of the war, Kuwait, Bahrain and the
            ITucial States were all firmly within the British sphere of influence.
           The only shaykhdom on the Arab coast that was not was Qatar,
            which had come under Ottoman domination in 1872 with the
           occupation of Hasa. The Ottoman position was constantly regarded
            as a threat to British interests in the Gulf, especially as Muhammad
            bin Thani of Qatar had signed an agreement with Britain in 1868
            in which he had undertaken not to commit any breach of the
            maritime truce. Early in the twentieth century, the British authorities
            discussed the possibility of concluding a regular treaty with Qatar,
            but it was not until November 1916 that it was signed. Shaykh
            ‘Abdallah bin Qasim Al-Thani then undertook to guard Qatar
            against slavery, piracy, the arms  trade and concessions to foreigners,
            in return  for which Britain assured him of protection against all
           aggression by sea, of Britain’s ‘good offices in   case of an attack
            by land.34 Apart from this latter undertaking, which was unique
            to Qatar, the agreement was worded much the same as the agreements
            with the Trucial shaykhdoms.               . ,  ,  _   ...   ,,
              Other agreements included those of 1902 with the Trucial shayk 1-
            doms wherebv their rulers undertook to prohibit the import and
            export of arms;35 and those of 1911 with the Trucial States, Bahrain
            and Kuwait, whereby their rulers promised not to grant pearling
            or sponging concessions without the prior consent of the Bntish
            Government.36 The most important new agreements, howevci, and
            those that were radically to affect policy during the inter-war period
                  those that promised that no concessions for oil would be
            were  th°        1          appointed by the Bntish Government.
            granted except to a person
   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55