Page 61 - The Origins of the United Arab Emirates_Neat
P. 61

The Challenge lo Power: Brother, Nephew and Son  37

                                   Table 6
                               Rulers of Ajman

        Ruler               Dates of rule  Length   Relationship  Termination
                                       of rule   lo       of rule
                                       (years)  predecessor

        Rashid bin Humayd   pro 1820   c. 18              natural death
                             1838
        Humayd bin Rashid   1838-1841     3    son        deposed
        ‘Abd al-‘Aziz bin
        Rashid              1841-1848     7    brother    killed in
                                                            battle
        Humayd bin Rashid   1848-1873    25    brother    natural death       I
        Rashid bin Humayd   1873-1891    18    son        natural death       !
        Humayd bin Rashid   1891 1900     9    son        killed              I
        ‘Abd al-‘Aziz bin
        Humayd              1900-1910    10    uncle      killed
        Humayd bin ‘Abd al
        ‘Aziz               1910-1928    18    son        natural death
        Rashid bin Humayd   1928-              son


        factionalism within the family group would have had serious conse­
        quences in terms of the size of the opposition, which could be
        expected to amount to well over 100 people. Factionalism of such      ;<
        a kind would clearly be disastrous for a commercial community
        like that of Dubai.
          Ajman and Umm al-Qaiwain also had much in common. Both
        were small and relatively unimportant in the power hierarchy of
        the Coast. There are no available estimates as to the respective
        sizes of their ruling families early in the present century, but it
        is clear that both were quite small, as in the case of Sharjah
        and Abu Dhabi. Since they were both less important and less           !
        powerful than the latter two shaykhdoms, however, there were
                                                                              I’
        fewer rulers deposed or murdered.
          The period of instability following the death of a ruler was
        usually greatest where he had held power for a long time. Two
        reasons for this seem clear. The first is that, with the passing
        of the years, the number of contenders for the leadership—brothers,
        nephews, cousins and sons—would naturally increase. Secondly, the
        length of his reign would give the ruler time to consolidate his
        position and that of the shaykhdom, leaving the rest of the ruling
        family more to fight over.
          We have already seen how the death of Sultan bin Saqr of
        Sharjah, who ruled for over sixty years, brought on great internal
        instability. As it was, his rule was punctuated by much turbulence
        within the Qasimi family, particularly over the administration of
   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66