Page 143 - Truncal States to UAE_Neat
P. 143

Chapter Three


                     preparation of their cases for arbitration consisted to a large extent
                     of the collection of evidence that taxes or zakdh had been paid by
                     certain groups or individuals to either of the two powers. Although it
                     is some manifestation of sovereignly if a Ruler can collect tax from
                     nomadic and settled tribal groups, this does not necessarily always
                     mean that his authority is therefore any more acceptable to them. As
                     many of the cases collated in the UK Memorial and the Saudi
                     Memorial, both digested in J.B. Kelly’s book Eastern Arabian
                     Frontiers, show, taxes were paid when it was difficult to refuse, or as
                     Bertram Thomas puts it: “It is an insurance premium, and by no
                     means signifies a voluntary or lasting acknowledgement of sov­
                     ereignty.  ”05  Particularly in respect of people such as the beduin
                     Manaslr or the semi-settled groups of the Bani Yas in Dhafrah, the A1
                     Bu Falah Ruler’s authority was manifest not so much in the latter
                     having the power to collect taxes as in the tribes turning to him for
                     protection, subsidies, jurisdiction and the feeling of identity.

                     Customs duties
                     Within the confinement of a community, such as the coastal
                     settlements, it is not difficult for a Ruler to exert authority over
                     groups and individuals, even over those who are reluctant to fall in
                     line. There he could enforce unpopular rules and regulations with the
                     help of a few armed guards Caskar or fidawi), and he could for
                     example prohibit the construction of a house on a particular site, he
                     could control the rent of shops in the sue/ and interfere in many
                     aspects of the daily life of the people.
                       The imposition of customs at the major ports has always been a
                     Rulers undisputed right. On trade overland, however, no customs
                     dues were collected, such as on the transport of earthenware pots or
                     camel-saddles from 'Ibri to the Buraimi villages. Nor was the market
                     at Daid subject to customs duties for goods from Oman. In theTrucial
                     States dues varied between per cent recorded earlier this century
                     for Sharjah and 2j per cent current in Abu Dhabi during the 1950s.
                     There were customs collectors at Sharjah as well as Rafs al Khaimah
                    even  before the complete separation into two shaikhdoms. The
                    Rulers of Abu Dhabi maintained a customs collector in Abu Dhabi
                    and on Dalma.86 A duty of 2\ per cent of the value of imports except
                    for pearls was levied in both places.87
                      On first sight it seems that there was a lot of room for argument
                    over the value of cargoes on local craft carrying firewood from Iran or

                    US





                                                                                        4
   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148