Page 29 - spring18
P. 29

by Robin Tricoles

           The Language


           of ‘Intelligence Augmentation’


           Examining human and computer interdependence




              est easy, people. The recent revolution in
           Rartificial intelligence won’t be spawning
           computers hell-bent on doing in the human
           race. Instead, artificial intelligence, or AI,
           will be working with us and not against us,
           in what Mihai Surdeanu terms “intelligence
           augmentation,” or IA.
              Surdeanu, a University of Arizona associate
           professor of computer science, touched on the
           differences between AI and the human mind —
           and where AI is headed — in his talk titled “The
           Minds of Machines.” The talk was part of the
           College of Science 2018 lecture series, “Humans,
           Data and Machines,” which delved into various
           aspects of the revolutionary social change now
           underway with the convergence of the physical,
           digital and biological worlds.
              Surdeanu said that one of the starkest
           differences between the human mind and AI
           was noted by 20th-century philosopher Martin
           Heidegger, whose work focused on what it means
           to be.
              “Essentially, what Heidegger is saying is that
           what we are, and what the world is, are mutually
           interdependent,” Surdeanu said. “There’s no
           objective world apart from our experiences of it,                                   Computer scientist Mihai Surdeanu
           just as our experiences cannot be separated from                                    speaks at the College of Science
           the world in which they occur.”             “We shouldn’t trust in decisions without an   lecture series in Centennial Hall.
              In other words, “Existence is interpretation,   explanation of why they’re happening,” he said.   / Bob Demers, UANews photo
           and interpretation is existence,” Surdeanu said.  “In the future, we will have systems that have
              In fact, Heidegger went to the trouble to   the ability to explain themselves, which is better
           coin the word “Dasein” to describe humans’   than most of us can do.”
           self-conscious existence and capacity for self-  Of course, AI can help humans with
           interpretation. Computers lack these, which   monumental tasks, such as quickly mining
           limits their capacity for humanlike intelligence.  and sorting data that humans can later use for
              For example, when it comes to learning   research that only humans can do.
           human language, AI has a limited ability to grasp   That’s why Surdeanu said he prefers
           syntax, sarcasm or metaphor. Another example is   “intelligence augmentation” to “artificial
           decision making. Artificial intelligence can make   intelligence.” After all, artificial intelligence
           decisions, but it can’t yet explain why it made the   originally was designed to complement us, not to
           decision it did, Surdeanu said.          replace us.





                                                                                                              SPRING 2018 27
   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34