Page 392 - Manual Of Operating Practices For Trade Remedy Investigations
P. 392

Disclosure Statement & Final Finding

               constitutes less than 70% of the total volume of exports to India by the respective
               Producer, then the responding producer may be considered non-co-operative and
               entire response is liable to be rejected.

               16.27.  A residual duty margin must be indicated for non-co-operative and/or non-
               responding producers/exporters for each of the subject country under investigation.

               16.28.  Wherever, it is found that a co-operative producer exporter is not indulging
               in dumping or injury, “zero” duty should be mentioned against it in the duty table.
               Further, when it is determined that imports from any of the subject country are not
               causing dumping or injury to the domestic industry at all or are below de minimus,
               then the said country should not be included in the duty table and it should be
               clearly stated that investigation is being terminated against the said country.

               16.29.  It may be added here that any exporter whose margin of dumping is less
               than 2% of the export price shall be excluded from the purview of ADD even if
               dumping, injury as well as the causal link are established. Further, investigations
               against any country are required to be terminated if the volume of the dumped
               imports from a particular country is found to be below 3% of the total imports.
               However, countries whose volume of imports individually is less than 3% of
               total imports but cumulatively account for more than 7%, imports from all those
               countries may be cumulated while determining injury.

               16.30.  Since no Customs Notification is generally issued in case of termination of
               investigations, the final findings must include a paragraph in case of termination of
               investigations, specifying that the appeal against these findings lies in CESTAT, the
               Hon’ble  Delhi High Court has given a ruling in this regard in Jindal Polyfilm Ltd.  v.
               Designated Authority in W.P. (Civil) No. 8202/2017.

               16.31.  The recommendation of duty in the Final Finding notification should be
               indicated in the duty table indicating details regarding Tariff/ HS Code, description
               of PUC, specification, country of origin and/or export, producer, amount of duty
               and unit of measurement. The format of duty table is as below:

                                               Duty Table
                 Sl.   Tariff   Description  Specifi-  Country of   Pro-   Duty    UOM
                No     code    of Goods    cation  Origin and/or  ducer  Amount
                                                      export
                 (1)    (2)       (3)        (4)        (5)        (6)      (7)     (8)





                                                 369
   387   388   389   390   391   392   393   394   395   396   397