Page 516 - Manual Of Operating Practices For Trade Remedy Investigations
P. 516

Safeguard Investigations

               21.53  The WTO Panel  in  the case  of Korea-Dairy  Productsset  forth the basic
               approach for determining “causation”, which inter-alia includes that in its causation
               assessment, the national authority is obliged to evaluate all relevant factors of an
               objective and quantifiable nature having a bearing on the situation of that industry.
               In addition, if the national authority has identified factors other than increased
               imports which have caused injury to the Domestic Industry, it shall ensure that any
               injury caused by such factors is not considered to have been caused by the increased
               imports. In addition, having analysed the situation of the Domestic Industry, the
               authority has the obligation not to attribute to the increased imports any injury
               caused by other factors.

               21.54  The Appellate Body in the US-Safeguard Measures on Wheat Gluten held
               that the existence of causal link does not mean that increased imports are the sole
               cause of injury.  According to the Appellate Body the language of Article 4.2(b)
               suggests that the causal link between the increased imports and serious injury may
               exist, even though other factors are also contributing “at the same time” to the
               situation of the domestic industry.


               Adjustment Plan
               21.55  “Adjustment Plan” refers to an action plan which a domestic industry is
               required to  submit, that describes a set of quantified  goals, specific plans, and
               timetables that a concerned industry commits to undertake in order to facilitate
               positive adjustment of the industry to import competition. One of the core features
               of the WTO Agreement on Safeguards is emphasis on adjustment by the domestic
               industry.


               Reviews of Safeguard Duty
               21.56  Rule 18 of the Safeguard Rules, 1997 provides for the review of Safeguard
               Duties. Rule 18 reads as under:

               (1)   The Director General shall, from time to time, review the need for continued
                     imposition of the safeguard duty and shall, if he is satisfied on the basis of
                     information received to him that,
                     (i)    safeguard duty is necessary to prevent or remedy serious injury
                            and there is evidence that the industry is adjusting positively, it may
                            recommend to the Central Government for the continued imposition
                            of duty;



                                                 493
   511   512   513   514   515   516   517   518   519   520   521