Page 45 - Lessons-Learned-at-Pax-River_Neat

program did.

Second, the F-35 program is more complex than programs before it, and they had to
craft a test approach that fit the complexity of the aircraft and program itself. The inte-
gration of both Edwards and Pax to conduct ongoing synergistic testing was a key point
in that direction.

Third, the program is one of “spiral development” in which combat F-35 Type/Model/
Series (T/M/S) airplanes emerge throughout the process to operate as effective combat
assets, even while the developmental testing for all three types of F-35s continue. Put
bluntly, the F-35B in the hands of the Marines is a fully combat-capable asset that will
evolve over time.

Fourth, the airplane is the most integrated combat jet ever built, in terms of systems, fu-
sion, and software. And, even though integrated, it is a very robust system in which
cascading issues from any particular component or system really has limited effect on
the overall F-35 air combat system. This robustness is found in the integrated systems’
ability to continue functioning in the presence of component failures. Thus, it is a safe
combat aircraft.

Fifth, to put the team together required a different cultural approach, whereby special-
ists must act as integrators across the airframe and avionic components of the airplane.
This is clearly different from legacy programs.

Sixth, the decade of putting together the unique and innovative approach to shaping the
F-35 fleet is laying down the foundation for the decade ahead in which the services and
partners generate the combat experience — which will then lead to further innovations
and developmental testing.

Put bluntly, if you are waiting for the end of developmental testing, come back in 30-40
years.

Meanwhile, the F-35 fleet will have reshaped air combat operations.

Question: How integrated is the test force here and at Edwards?

Second Line of Defense Lessons Learned at Pax River
! 4! 4