Page 17 - Amniotic Portfolio - RV4 2020 w_ WP
P. 17

elHeneidy et al                                                                          Dovepress

                                5,6
            and antimicrobial effects.  The reduction in scarring after   on the rate of healing of such nonhealing ulcers. Patients were
            application of AM to wounds might be due to the anti-  recruited from the outpatient clinics or the inpatient wards
            inflammatory effects, acceleration of epithelialization, 3,4,7   of the Department of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine,
                                 8
            and inhibition of fibrosis.  Accelerated reepithelialization   Cairo University and Department of Vascular Surgery,
                                          9
            was also demonstrated by Maral et al  after covering split   Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University from June 2012 to
                                                          10
            thickness skin graft with AM in rats. Loeffelbein et al    June 2015. Each patient signed an informed consent after
            demonstrated accelerated formation of basement membrane   accepting to be enrolled in the study. Ethical aspects whether
            in wounds treated with AM that might be due to the release   substantial or procedural have been implicated in this study
            of growth factors. One of the most important properties of   and approval was obtained from the Faculty of Medicine,
            AM as a skin substitute is pain relieving which may be due   Ethical Committee of Cairo University (30-9-2012).
            to diminished inflammation, better hydration of wound bed,   Patients were then randomly divided into two different
                                              10
            and protection of exposed nerve endings.  AM expresses   groups. Group I (the control group) included eleven patients
            few antigens, which accounts for its good tolerability and   with eleven chronic leg ulcers in whom ulcers were treated
                                        11
            the absence of rejection reactions.  AM expresses many   with conventional wound dressings that were changed daily
            neurotrophic and angiogenic factors: endothelin-2 and -3, vas-  for 8 weeks. Group II (the study group) included 14 patients
            cular endothelial growth factor, vascular endothelial growth   with 14 chronic leg ulcers. The AM was placed in contact
            factor-B, Tie-2 angiopoietin receptor, ephrin-A2, ephrin   with the ulcer and held in place with a secondary dressing,
            receptors A2, B1, B3, B4, B5, neuropilin-2, nerve growth   which was changed daily. Inclusion criteria were presence
            factor receptor, and semaphorin-F19 as well as erythropoi-  of leg ulcers for more than 3 months with no improvement
            etin and its receptor that contribute to healing of wounds. 12,13    despite standard treatment and age between 26 and 43 years.
            Some studies demonstrated the effectiveness of AM graft   Exclusion criteria were ulcers with ongoing active infection
            for healing of wounds. Mermet et al  put an AM graft for   and presence of diabetes. Full history taking and clinical
                                         14
            15 chronic leg ulcers and healing occurred in all patients.   assessment were done with special reference to previous
            Pesteil et al  used cryopreserved AM in eight patients with   treatment and surgery, diagnosed diabetes and/or hyperten-
                     15
            resistant vascular ulcers. Tolerance to the graft was excel-  sion, causes, types, and duration of ulcers present.
            lent with healing of six out of eight patients with significant   The follow-up during treatment period includes assess-
            improved pain. Alsina-Gibert and Pedregosa-Fauste  used   ment of ulcer healing and pain. Ulcer healing was assessed
                                                      16
            AM for four refractory ulcers with a mean 81.93% reduction   using the percentage of the healed wound area and healing
            of ulcer size after 16 weeks. Litwiniuk et al  suggested the   rate. Using ImageJ program (Rasband, W.S., ImageJ, US
                                               17
            potential role of matrix metalloproteinase inhibitors present   National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA), the
            in radiation-sterilized amnion dressing in healing of 23 out   wound areas were analyzed and a percentage of the healed
            of 25 patients with chronic venous ulcers. Sheikh et al  used   wound area was calculated, in respect to the original wound
                                                      18
            dehydrated amnion to provoke healing of chronic wounds   area and the final wound area after 2 weeks and at the end
            in four patients and healed wounds did not recur on long-  of 2 months according to the formula:
            term follow-up. A similar study was done by Zelen et al
                                                          19
            who used dehydrated AM in diabetic foot ulcers with com-  Percentage of   Original wound area −  Final wound area
            plete healing of 37 out of 40 ulcers. With respect to the low   healed wound area  =  Original wound area  ×  100
            cost, wide availability, and easy preparation, AM can be an
            ideal graft for chronic refractory ulcers.
                                                                 The healing rate was then determined, in respect to
            Subjects and methods                              the original wound area, and the final wound area reached
            study design                                      according to the formula:
            This was an experimental, comparative, and randomized
            clinical trial.                                        Healing rate =  Original wound area Finalwound area−
                                                                             Time consuumed to reach finalwound area
            Description of patients and collection of data
            This study was performed to test a technique for the treatment   The wound area is calculated by the formula for deter-
                                                                                                            20
            of chronic nonhealing wounds using AM to express its effect   mining the area of an ellipse ((length × width) × π/4).


            226    submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com                 International Journal of Women’s Health 2016:8
                   Dovepress
   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22