Page 169 - Copper and Bronze in Art: Corrosion, Colorants, Getty Museum Conservation, By David Scott
P. 169

as the high concentration of anions required for them to precipitate, is evident. The range of val­
           ues  reflects those that might be found in average rain or fog for each anionic species.
              McNeil  and Mor (1992) attempted  to rationalize thermodynamic data on the basis of sta­
           bility diagrams  for four variables: Eh, pH, activity of sulfate  ions, and  activity of copper  ions.
           The  resulting diagram  is four-dimensional and  difficult  to  apply to particular  cases.  Projec­
           tion into a Pourbaix diagram format allows more than one  stable  sulfate mineral to be plotted;
           chalcanthite, antlerite, and brochantite can form  depending on the conditions. These diagrams
           are  of interest  because  they  show  a  more  restricted  field  of stability  for  antlerite  than  for
           brochantite occurring between Eh +0.4 and  +1.0, and between pH 3.5 and 4.5. Brochantite can
           form under  a variety of conditions, including those in which water is the most prevalent phase.
                                 I  ARTIFICIAL BROCHANTITE AND ANTLERITE  PATINAS  Because
           brochantite  and antlerite are  the  most  stable  phases in the  outer  corrosion crust under  many
           atmospheric  conditions, Vendl  (1999) has  been evaluating the possibility of using these miner­
           als in an artificial patina  as a protective  finish  for outdoor bronzes.  Synthetic brochantite or a
           mixture of synthetic brochantite  and antlerite should be much more  stable  than organic  coat­
           ings to withstand exposure  to the elements; f sufficiendy  compact, they can provide good pro­
                                              i
           tection  for  the  underlying bronze.  Since  1996, Vendl  has  been conducting exposure  trials of
           copper and bronze samples coated with brochantite in Freemantle, Western Australia; in Bang­
           kok, Thailand; in Göteborg,  Sweden;  and in New York,  San  Francisco,  and Honolulu in the
           United  States. Preliminary results  suggest that  the  brochantite  patinas  are  performing well.
           They are  aesthetically pleasing and show no appreciable  dissolution or change in appearance.
          As would be expected, there  are differences in the surface  color of the patinas  depending on the
           pollutants in the different exposure  environments.


          Posnjakite                Posnjakite,  which  is monoclinic like brochantite,  is a vitreous
                                    green or dark blue mineral with a low Mohs hardness, between
           2 and  3. It is not particularly common  as a patina component. Essentially a hydrated brochan­
           tite, posnjakite  was identified  as a mineral by Komkov and Nefedov  (i967)  from  the oxidation
           zone of tungsten mineral deposits in the central regions of Kazakhstan. It was  first  observed in
           copper patinas by Biestek and Drys (1974).
              Posnjakite  is  isomorphic with  langite, Cu 4 (S0 4 )(OH) 6 -2H 2 0, which  has  not  yet  been
           reported as a corrosion product of bronzes, although it has been identified  as a painting pigment
           (discussed  later, under  "Basic Sulfates  as Pigments"). The existence  of a hydrated basic sulfate
          of  copper  was  first  mentioned by Vernon and Whitby  (1930), but  since posnjakite  and langite
          were unknown at the time, this phase remained unidentified. Posnjakite is identical to brochan­
          tite in stoichiometry, except for the water of hydration. Graedel (i987a) thought that posnjakite







                         C H A P T E R  F I V E
                         152
   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174