Page 42 - Chinese and Asian Ceramics from an Indonesian Collection
P. 42

Chapter 3. Ceramic Trade and the Musi Rive


            were imported to the Chinese Han Dynasty around 200   Karanganyar, Palembang, has ‘several ‘chicken headed
            BC from Java for the use of courtesans to purify their   ewer’ on  display  from  the Sui  Dynasty.  These were
            breath when encountering the emperor. Presumably   collected from a coastal site slightly north and inland
            these  cloves  were  transported  from  the  Moluccas,  to   from the mouth of the Musi River. Another similar ewer
            Java via local Indonesian vessels.  (Chinese junks did   was seen by us; it was found to the north of Palembang.
            occasionally visit the Moluccas directly during the Tang   Recent discoveries of ceramics at Karangagung and Air
            Dynasty to collect cloves). Donkin (2003) reports that   Sugihan and numerous other settlements, particularly
            during the Eastern Han period Chinese silks reached   near Air Sugihan, and probably associated with the
            the Roman Empire via the ocean route. And Manguin   trading polities of both Koying and Kantoli, indicated
            and Augustijanto (2011) stated that the Han Emperor   that both traded with India and China between the
            Wu (140–87 BC) sent traders to the south seas to collect   2nd and 6th centuries. Despite the presence as traders
            glass beads, which would have reached China via Mantai   in several areas of Indonesia, Miksic is correct that
            (Sri Lanka), Khlong Thom or Oc Eo.                 their remains no evidence of any extensive trading in
               The first recorded export of Chinese pottery to South   ceramics during the Han Dynasty and no pottery seen
            East Asia was evidenced at Khao Sam Kaeo, on the Siamo-  by us from the Musi can be definitively attributed to the
            Malay Peninsula, where Bellina-Pryce & Silapanth (2006)   Han. However, there is indeed evidence that Chinese
            found shards of Western Han ware decorated with stamped   ceramics reached Indonesia before the Tang Dynasty.
            designs and dated to the 1st and 2nd century. Miksic (2017)
            stated that this region of the Peninsular was already a nexus   Tang Dynasty (618–906)
            for trade between South East Asia and South Asia in the   In addition to Sriwijaya at Palembang, two other ports
            4th century BC. Several Han Dynasty ceramic objects in the   were key entrepôt for trade during the Tang Dynasty,
            Museum Nasional Jakarta were supposedly unearthed in   both within South East Asia and with China, India and
            Sumatra and Kalimantan but no archaeological evidence   the Middle East. These were Siraf, on the northern shore
            of such trade has been discovered (Guy 1990:2). Later,   of the Persian Gulf, in what is now the Iranian Province
            Miksic (2017) wrote that Chinese ceramics from the Han   of Bushehr; and Guangzhou on the east coast of China.
            Dynasty to Three Kingdoms and Six Dynasties periods   The latter was extremely important, although it suffered
            on display in the National Museum of Indonesia were in   setbacks in 758 when it was attacked by Persian and Arabs
            fact collected in China and then sold on to Indonesia as   in response to perceived unfair administrative practices
            though they were collected in Indonesia.           by port authorities. Tang troops retaliated and massacred
               Miksic (2017) stated that there is no evidence that   thousands of the foreign citizens of Yangzhou, the
            Chinese  ceramics  reached  Indonesia  before  the  Tang   major market of south-eastern China and an important
            Dynasty (616–916). He concluded Han Dynasty shards   transhipment  point for  overseas  imports.  Further,  in
            found at Khao Sam Kaeo, Central Vietnam and West Java   878 Guangzhou was attacked by the rebel Huang Chao
            were too few in number to be considered exports. And   killing perhaps as many as 200,000 Muslims, Christians,
            that no Chinese traders were active in South East Asia until   Jews and  Zoroastrians  (Leibner  2014).  These  events
            much later. However, recent re-analysis of glass and bronze   impacted trading in Sriwijaya, such that throughout the
            burial goods at Pacung, north coastal Bali Island, suggest   years  755–763,  the  ‘Celestial  Annals’  record  only  the
            strong links to present day Vietnam, which by the late-  arrival of one evidently seaborne Sri Lankan mission (in
            2nd to 1st century BC had begun to be influenced by the   762) at the Tang court. Overall, since 750 the number
            Western Han Chinese. This influence was also indicated   of recorded South and Southeast Asian embassy visits to
            by pottery at nearby Sembiran on Bali Island, that was   China dropped markedly, and did not recover until the
            similar to low fired Han-style paddle impressed pottery   rise of the Song Dynasty. The first of these was by the Cham
            from southern and northern Vietnam. Interestingly, these   in 958 and was followed in rapid succession by visits from
            Han pottery shards were found in association with other   Sriwijaya ambassadors beginning in 960.
            wares of possible mainland South East Asian origin, eastern   The first evidence of large-scale Chinese trade in
            Indonesian pottery, and the highest concentration of fine   ceramics in South East Asia comes from the Tang Dynasty
            Indian wares. This suggested to Cort et al. (2015) that   ship wrecked some three kilometres off the coast of
            Bali had multiple and broadly simultaneous contacts with   Belitung Island, Indonesia, around 827. This wreck
            different regions of the Indian subcontinent, Mainland   commonly referred to as the Batu Hitam wreck, contained
            South East Asia and eastern Indonesian islands starting   approximately 67,000 ceramics objects, gold, silver, iron,
            from the late-1st millennium BC. While it is possible that   lead, bone, wood, stone, glass, mostly of Chinese origin
            the Han Chinese were involved in this early Bali trade   and a  range  of  spices. The  ceramics  included  Tang
            only vicariously through the Vietnamese, it is more likely   Dynasty Yue wares, Changsha wares, green-glazed wares
            that Chinese traders were directly involved as China was   and north China white wares. This combination of wares
            sourcing cloves from the east of Bali via Java as early as   on the Batu Hitam led Ming-liang (2010) to conclude
            200 BC.                                            that the boat, probably skippered by sailors from Siraf
               Miksic (2017) does state that a few shards attributed   in the Persian Gulf, loaded the bulk of its merchandise
            to the short lived Sui Dynasty (589–617) were found   and set sail from ‘Yangzhou, situated at the crossroads
            in south Sumatra. The Museum Kerajaan Sriwijaya at   of the Grand Canal and the Yangzi River, a converging

                                                                                                             25
   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47