Page 33 - Chinese pottery and porcelain : an account of the potter's art in China from primitive times to the present day
P. 33

Introduction  xxi

by the same metallic oxides as formed the basis of the cognate
glazes on Ming pottery. They used high-fired feldspathic glazes,
 white, browish green, chocolate brown, purplish black, and tea-

 dust green, sometimes with frothy splashes of grey or bluish grey,
as on the Sung wares. Sometimes these glazes were superposed as

 on the Japanese tea jars, which avowedly owed their technique
 to Chinese models. It is evident that streaked and mottled effects
 appealed specially to the taste of the time, and marbling both of
 the glaze and of the body was practised. Carving designs in low
 relief, or incising them with a pointed instrument and filling in the
 spaces with coloured glazes, stamping small patterns on the body,
 and applying reliefs which had been previously pressed out in
'moulds, were methods employed for surface decoration. Painted
 designs in unfired pigments appear on some of the tomb wares,
 and it is now practically certain that painting in black under
 a green glaze was used by the T'ang potters. Moreover, the

 existence of porcelain proper in the T'ang period is definitely

 established.

      One of the most remarkable features of T'ang pottery is the

 strong Hellenistic flavour apparent in the shapes of the vessels

 and in certain details of the ornament, particularly in the former.
 Other foreign influences observable in T'ang art are Persian, Sas-
 sanian, Sc}i:ho-Siberian, and Indian, and one would say that Chinese
 art at this period was in a peculiarly receptive state. As compared
 with the conventional style of later ages which we have come to
 regard as characteristically Chinese, the T'ang art is quite dis-

 tinctive, and almost foreign in many of its aspects.
     The revelation of T'ang ceramics has provided many surprises,

 and doubtless there are more in store for us. There are certainly

 many gaps to fill and many apparent anomalies to explain. We

  are still in the dark with regard to the potter's art of the four hun-

 dred years which separate the Han and T'ang dynasties. The

  Buddhist sculptures of this time reveal a high level of artistic

 development, and we may assume that the minor arts, and pottery
 among them, were not neglected. When some light is shed from

 excavation or otherwise upon this obscure interval, no doubt we
   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38