Page 211 - Art In The Age Of Exploration (Great Section on Chinese Art Ming Dynasty)
P. 211

106
                                                  tian  official  resident in Damascus, being received  accurately rendered, from  the wooden armatures
      Circle of Gentile Bellini                   by a senior Mamluk official,  probably the  na'ib or  of the brick housing of Damascus to the minarets
      Venetian                                    governor of Damascus. The na'ib is seated on a  of the  Great Mosque, which are shown complete
                                                  dais (mastaba),  and his rank is confirmed  by his  with their  struts  for hanging lamps;  in fact,  the
      THE  RECEPTION   OF THE                     curious  "horned" turban,  a type used only by the  painting provides the only extant visual  record of
      AMBASSADORS    IN  DAMASCUS                 Mamluk Sultan and his top officials.  The figure is  the  double tambour  of the  dome of the  Great
                                                  flanked by members of the  Mamluk military  elite.  Mosque. The angle and distance from  which  the
      c. 1488-1499                                The topicality  of this tableau  contrasts with that  Great Mosque is depicted suggest that the  painter
      oil on canvas                               on the  left  of the  picture, which is a generalized  had a view from  the Venetian fondaco,  or com-
                7
      175 x  201  (68 /s  x  yyVs)                rendering of a street  scene with  a mounted  mercial center, which was situated to the  south of
      references:  Sauvaget 1945—1946; Pallucchini 1966,
      49—51; Raby  1982, 55-60, n. 51, 63, n. 86  Mamluk,  armed attendant  and two camel  drivers  the mosque  (Sauvaget  1945-1946).
                                                  with their beasts. The compositional link between  The identification of the  setting  as Damascus
      Musee  du Louvre, Paris, Departement  des Peintures  the  two scenes is provided by a third group which  puts to rest a long-held belief that the painting
                                                  occupies the immediate  central foreground.  This  was by Gentile  Bellini and depicted the  Court of
      This painting is a landmark in Europe's visual  depicts three figures  in conversation, while a  Mehmed the Conqueror in Istanbul.  This  attribu-
      record of the  East, the  earliest known attempt  to  young boy nearby holds a monkey on a leash. A  tion can be traced back at least to the  seventeenth
      represent a realistic panorama  of an exotic  loca-  sequence of animals — camels on the  left, a mon-  century,  when  it was recorded by Boschini.  There
      tion.  The remarkable accuracy of its details makes  key in the center, and deer on the  right—provides  is no evidence that Gentile Bellini ever visited the
      it a valuable source for the  architecture and cos-  not only incidental interest, but also additional  Mamluk domains of Syria and Egypt, and  the
      tumes of late fifteenth-century  Damascus.  coherence by linking the parts of the  immediate  attribution is a clear example of how the  legends
        The painting is divided into two registers:  the  foreground.                        that grew up around Gentile Bellini's visit to
      upper shows the  skyline of Damascus, dominated  The contrived composition of the  lower  register  Istanbul influenced the understanding of almost
      by the minarets, gable, and dome of the eighth-  does little, however,  to diminish  the  immediacy  all early  European depictions  of the  East.  It was
      century Great Mosque.  The lower register is a  and realism of the painting as a whole.  The city is  effectively  abandoned when in  1895  Charles
      somewhat  contrived juxtaposition of three  scenes:  minutely  observed, even down to minor details  Schefer correctly identified the setting as Mamluk
      on the right is a historical incident  that depicts a  such as the body-harness  of the monkey  and the  rather than Ottoman.
      Venetian deputation,  perhaps the  bailo, the Vene-  Mamluk blazons on the walls. The architecture is  Schefer,  however, mistakenly identified the

      210   CIRCA  1492
   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216