Page 247 - Art In The Age Of Exploration (Great Section on Chinese Art Ming Dynasty)
P. 247

appearance in his early  twenties.  On the other
       hand, the young man's glove and rich  costume
       indicate that he was someone  of high  status, so
       identification with  the young  duke is possible.
       There  are records of a portrait  of Pacioli in  the
       ducal collection in Urbino from  the  late  sixteenth
       century, when  it was attributed to Piero della
       Francesca, until  1654  (Naples and  Rome 1983).  (It
       should be noted that the traditional identification
       of a portrait  of Pacioli in  the  background of  Piero's
       altarpiece of the  Madonna  and Saints  with  Duke
       Federigo  da Montefeltro  (Brera, Milan) should be
       treated with  extreme  caution, not only on  chron-
       ological grounds but  also in view of the  improb-
       ability that a Franciscan monk would be portrayed
       as the  notable Dominican saint, Peter  Martyr.)
       Although  it is unclear how and when  the  present
       panel arrived in Naples, there seems no need to
       presume the  existence of two  separate versions of
       the portrait.
         There are numerous  filled-in paint losses across
       the panel and an area of severe damage in the  left
       corner. The main figurative elements  have  sur-
       vived in reasonably reliable condition,  although
       Pacioli's left  eye shows  signs of having been
       reworked.  The most  frustrating area of damage
       and retouching occurs around the  last digit of the
       date.  The paint is handled in a solid and  unfussy
       manner, with restrained  passages of textural
       description and beautifully observed reflections in
       the suspended polyhedron.  The draftsmanship
       places considerable emphasis upon simple volu-
       metric shapes and carefully  observed  cast  shad-
       ows—characteristics that suggest  the influence of
       Piero della Francesca, either  directly or  through
       Venetian intermediaries  such as Antonello da
       Messina and Alvise  Vivarini.
         Whatever  the remaining  historical  problems,
       the  portrait  of Pacioli in Naples is exceptional as
       the  most  substantial  and evocative  record of any
       man of science from  the  early  Renaissance.
                                           M.K.



                                                  of the  Ognissanti  and placed on the  right wall of  Botticelli's is likely  to have been painted  at about
                                                  the  nave.  This occurred following the  replacement  the  same time,  before his departure for Rome in
       144                                        of the Umiliati in the monastery  associated with  1481  to work in the  Sistine  Chapel.  The shield on

       Alessandro Botticelli                      the church by the Minor  Franciscan  Observants  the cornice above the  saint indicates that his
       Florentine, 1444 or 1445-1510              and the  consequent reorganization  of the  church  fresco was undertaken  for a member  of the  Ves-
                                                  interior,  which included removal of the  screen.  pucci family, a number  of whom  patronized  the
       THE  VISION  OF SAINT AUGUSTINE            The low viewpoint of the  study represented in  the  church.
                                                  painting—we are looking up from  the  level of the  Although  the images by Ghirlandaio and Bot-
       c. 1480                                    saint's ankles — may  well have been  chosen  in  ticelli both belong to the tradition  of the  contem-
       detached  fresco                           relation to the  original height  of the  choir and its  plative scholar-saint in his study, a tradition that
                    l
       185 x  123  (73 x  4.8/2)  (irregular)     screen above the  level of the  nave.  Following the  had been inspired in Florence largely by the  pres-
       references:  Milanesi  1905-1915, 3:311; Home 1908;
       Roberts  1959;  Rotondi  1959;  Meiss  1970;  Lightbown  flood  of 1966,  the  fresco  was removed again and  ence of a lost painting  of Saint  Jerome  by Jan van
       1978,  no.  ^25; Kemp  1984                restored.  Although  its present condition  shows  Eyck then  in the  Medici collection,  Botticelli's
                                                  clear signs of its adventures,  the  major  areas of  the  depiction has exceptionally introduced a narrative
       Church  of  the  Ognissanti,  Florence     composition are in surprisingly good condition.  It  element.  With great  eloquence he has illustrated a
                                                  was originally painted at the  right  of the  door into  spurious but apparently popular story  from  the
       In the  1560$ Botticelli's fresco was detached  from  the  choir as a companion piece to Domenico Ghir-  saint's  life.  A letter purporting to have been writ-
       its original location on the  screen wall  (tramezzo)  landaio's Saint  Jerome, which stood on the  left of  ten by Augustine to Saint  Cyril  (which was prob-
       separating the  nave from  the  choir of the  Church  the  door. Ghirlandaio's fresco  is dated  1480,  and  ably a thirteenth-century  invention)  recounted

      246   CIRCA  1492
   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252