Page 235 - Ray Dalio - Principles
P. 235

You can use your own principles, or you can use others’;
                       you just want to use the best ones possible well. If you think
                       that way constantly, you will become an excellent principled

                       thinker.



                      5.10 Believability weight your decision

                              making




                       I have found triangulating with highly believable people who
                       are willing to have thoughtful disagreements has never failed
                       to enhance my learning and sharpen the quality of my decision
                       making. It typically leads me to make better decisions than I
                       could  have  otherwise  and  it  typically  provides  me  with
                       thrilling learning. I urge you to do it.


                          To  do  it  well,  be  sure  to  avoid  the  common  perils  of:  1)
                       valuing your own believability more than is logical and 2) not
                       distinguishing between who is more or less credible.

                          In case of a disagreement with others, start by seeing if you
                       can agree on the principles that should be used to make that
                       decision. This discussion should include exploring the merits
                       of the reasoning behind the different principles. If you agree

                       on them, apply them to the case at hand and you’ll arrive at a
                       conclusion  everyone  agrees  on.  If  you  disagree  on  the
                       principles,  try  to  work  through  your  disagreement  based  on
                       your respective believabilities. I will explain how we do this in
                       more detail in Work Principles.

                          This sort of principled and believability-weighted decision

                       making is fascinating and leads to much different and much
                       better decision making than is typical. For example, imagine if
                       we  used  this  approach  to  choose  the  president.  It  would  be
                       fascinating  to  see  which  principles  we  would  come  up  with
                       both for determining what makes a good president as well as
                       for  deciding  who  is  most  believable  in  making  such
                       determinations.  Would  we  wind  up  with  something  like  one
                       person one vote, or something different? And if different, in

                       what ways? It certainly would lead to very different outcomes.
   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240