Page 347 - Ray Dalio - Principles
P. 347

Those rules and how you should follow them depend on your
                       relative believabilities. For example, it would not be effective
                       for the person who knows less to tell the person who knows

                       more how something should be done. It’s important to get the
                       balance between your assertiveness and your open-mindedness
                       right,  based  on  your  relative  levels  of  understanding  of  the
                       subject.

                          Think about whether the person you’re disagreeing with is
                       more or  less believable than you. If  you are less  believable,
                       you are more of a student and should be more open-minded,

                       primarily asking questions in order to understand the logic of
                       the  person  who  probably  knows  more.  If  you’re  more
                       believable, your role is more of a teacher, primarily conveying
                       your understanding and answering questions. And if you are
                       approximate peers, you should have a thoughtful exchange as
                       equals.  When  there  is  a  disagreement  about  who  is  more
                       believable, be reasonable and work it through. In cases when

                       you  can’t  do  this  alone  effectively,  seek  out  the  help  of  an
                       agreed-upon third party.

                          In all cases, try to see things through the other person’s eyes
                       so  that  you  can  obtain  understanding.  All  parties  should
                       remember that the purpose of debate is to get at truth, not to
                       prove  that  someone  is  right  or  wrong,  and  that  each  party
                       should be willing to change their mind based on the logic and

                       evidence.

                       a. It’s more important that the student understand the teacher than that the
                       teacher understand the student, though both are important. I have often
                       seen  less  believable  people  (students)  insist  that  the  more
                       believable  people  (teachers)  understand  their  thinking  and
                       prove why the teacher is wrong before listening to what the
                       teacher  (the  more  believable  party)  has  to  say.  That’s

                       backward.  While  untangling  the  student’s  thinking  can  be
                       helpful, it is typically difficult and time-consuming and puts
                       the emphasis on what the student sees instead of on what the
                       teacher wants to convey. For that reason, our protocol is for
                       the student to be open-minded first. Once the student has taken

                       in what the teacher has to offer, both student and teacher will
                       be  better  prepared  to  untangle  and  explore  the  student’s
   342   343   344   345   346   347   348   349   350   351   352