Page 386 - Ray Dalio - Principles
P. 386

but much more valuable in the long run. Though new employees will come to appreciate what you
                    are doing, it is typically difficult for them to understand it at first; to be effective, you must clearly
                    and repeatedly explain the logic and the caring behind it.
                    a.  Recognize  that  while  most  people  prefer  compliments,  accurate  criticism  is  more  valuable.  You’ve  heard  the
                    expression  “no  pain  no  gain.”  Psychologists  have  shown  that  the  most  powerful  personal
                    transformations come from experiencing the pain from mistakes that a person never wants to have
                    again—known as “hitting bottom.” So don’t be hesitant to give people those experiences or have
                    them yourself.
                       While  it  is  important  to  be  clear  to  people  about  what  they  are  doing  well,  it  is  even  more
                    important to point out their weaknesses and have them reflect on them.
                       Problems  require  more  time  than  things  that  are  going  well.  They  must  be  identified  and
                    understood and addressed, while things that are running smoothly require less attention. Instead of
                    celebrating how great we are, we focus on where we need to improve, which is how we got to be so
                    great.

                    9.5 Don’t hide your observations about people.


                    Explore them openly with the goal of figuring out how you and your people are built so that the
                    right people can be put in the right jobs.
                    a.  Build  your  synthesis  from  the  specifics  up.  By  synthesizing,  I  mean  converting  a  lot  of  data  into  an
                    accurate picture. Too many people make assessments of people without connecting them to specific
                    data. When you have all the specifics that we have at Bridgewater—the dots, meeting tapes, etc.—
                    you can and must work from the specifics up and see the patterns in the data. Even without such
                    tools, other data such as metrics, testing, and the input of others can help you form a more complete
                    picture of what the person is like, as well as examine what they did.
                    b. Squeeze the dots. Every observation of a person potentially tells you something valuable about how
                    they operate. As I explained earlier, I call these observations “dots.” A dot is a piece of data that’s
                    paired  with  your  inference  about  what  it  means—a  judgment  about  what  someone  might  have
                    decided, said, or thought. Most of the time we make these inferences and judgments implicitly and
                    keep  them  to  ourselves,  but  I  believe  that  if  they  are  collected  systematically  and  put  into
                    perspective over time, they can be extremely valuable when it’s time to step back and synthesize the
                    picture of a person.
                    c. Don’t oversqueeze a dot. Remember: A dot is just a dot; what matters is how they add up. Think of
                    each individual dot as an at-bat in baseball. Even great hitters are going to strike out many times,
                    and it would be foolish to evaluate them based on one trip to the plate. That’s why stats like on-base
                    percentage and batting average exist.
                       In other words, any one event has many different possible explanations, whereas a pattern of
                    behavior can tell you a lot about root causes. The number of observations needed to detect a pattern
                    largely depends on how well you get in sync after each observation. A quality discussion of how
                    and why a person behaved a certain way should help you understand the larger picture.

                    d.  Use  evaluation  tools  such  as  performance  surveys,  metrics,  and  formal  reviews  to  document  all  aspects  of  a  person’s
                    performance.It’s  hard  to  have  an  objective,  open-minded,  emotion-free  conversation  about
                    performance if there is no data to discuss. It’s also hard to track progress. This is part of the reason I
                    created the Dot Collector. I also recommend thinking about other ways that people’s responsibilities
                    can be put in metrics. One example: You can have people note whether they did or didn’t do things
                    on checklists, which you can then use to calculate what percentage of tasks they complete. Metrics
                    tell us whether things are going according to plan—they are an objective means of assessment and
                    they improve people’s productivity.


                    9.6  Make  the  process  of  learning  what  someone  is  like  open,
                         evolutionary, and iterative.


                    Articulate your assessment of a person’s values, abilities, and skills up front and share it; listen to
                    their and others’ responses to your description; organize a plan for training and testing; and reassess
   381   382   383   384   385   386   387   388   389   390   391