Page 92 - Malcolm Gladwell - Talking to Strangers
P. 92

D: After you obtained her concurrence or permission to finger her, and you did finger her, what
                         happened then?
                       Turner: I fingered her for a minute. And I thought she had an orgasm. And then I—well, during
                         that time, I asked her if she liked it, and she said, “Uh huh.”
                       And then:
                       D: And then after that, what did you do?

                       Turner: I started kissing with her again and then we started dry humping each other.
                       Under California law, someone is incapable of giving consent to sexual activity if they are either
                    unconscious or so intoxicated that they are “prevented from resisting.” Here is legal scholar Lori
                    Shaw:
                       It is not enough that the victim was intoxicated to some degree, or that the intoxication reduced
                       the  victim’s  sexual  inhibitions.…Instead,  the  level  of  intoxication  and  the  resulting  mental
                       impairment  must  have  been  so  great  that  the  victim  could  no  longer  exercise  reasonable
                       judgment concerning that issue. As one California prosecutor explained, “the intoxicated victim
                       must be so ‘out of it’ that she does not understand what she is doing or what is going on around
                       her. It is not a situation where the victim just ‘had too much to drink.’”

                       So was Doe a willing participant at the time of the sexual activity—and passed out afterward? Or
                    was she already incapable of consent at the time Turner put his finger inside her? People v. Brock
                    Turner is a case about alcohol. The entire case turned on the degree of Emily Doe’s drunkenness.

                       In the end, the jury ruled against Turner. His version of events was simply unconvincing. If—as
                    Turner  suggests—they  had  a  warm,  consensual  encounter,  why  did  he  run  the  moment  he  was
                    challenged by the two grad students? Why was he “dry humping” her after she had passed out? Just
                    after midnight, Doe left a voice mail for her boyfriend. The tape of that conversation was played for
                    the jury. She’s barely coherent. If the legal standard is “so ‘out of it’ that she does not understand
                    what she is doing,” then she sounded pretty close to that.
                       During the trial’s closing arguments, the prosecutor showed the jury a picture of Doe, taken as
                    she lay on the ground. Her clothes are half off. Her hair is disheveled. She’s lying on a bed of pine
                    needles. A dumpster is in the background. “No self-respecting woman who knows what’s going on
                    wants to get penetrated right there,” the prosecutor said. “This photo alone can tell you that he took
                    advantage of somebody who didn’t know what was going on.” Turner was convicted of three felony
                    counts  associated  with  the  illegal  use  of  his  finger:  assault  with  intent  to  commit  rape  of  an
                    intoxicated  or  unconscious  person,  sexual  penetration  of  an  intoxicated  person,  and  sexual
                    penetration of an unconscious person. He was sentenced to six months in prison and must register as
                    a sex offender for the rest of his life.
                       The who of the Brock Turner case was never in doubt. The what was determined by the jury. But
                    that still leaves the why. How did an apparently harmless encounter on a dance floor end in a crime?
                    We  know  that  our  mistaken  belief  that  people  are  transparent  leads  to  all  manner  of  problems
                    between  strangers.  It  leads  us  to  confuse  the  innocent  with  the  guilty  and  the  guilty  with  the
                    innocent. Under the best of circumstances, lack of transparency makes the encounter between a man
                    and a woman at a party a problematic event. So what happens when alcohol is added to the mix?


                                                           4.


                    Dwight Heath was a graduate student in anthropology at Yale University in the mid-1950s when he
                    decided to do the fieldwork for his dissertation in Bolivia. He and his wife, Anna Heath, flew to
                    Lima  with  their  baby  boy,  then  waited  five  hours  while  mechanics  put  boosters  on  the  plane’s
                    engines. “These were planes that the U.S. had dumped after World War II,” Heath recalls. “They
                    weren’t supposed to go above 10,000 feet. But La Paz, where we were headed, was at 12,000 feet.”
                    As they flew into the Andes, Anna Heath says, they looked down and saw the remnants of “all the
                    planes where the boosters didn’t work.”

                       From La Paz they traveled 500 miles into the interior of eastern Bolivia, to a small frontier town
   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97