Page 39 - Apologetics Student Textbook (3 Credits)
P. 39

substantially superior criteria for affirming the New Testament documents than he does for any other
               ancient writing.  It is good evidence on which to base the trust in the reliability of the New Testament.
               (https://carm.org/manuscript-evidence)

               Meticulous care was taken by Jewish Scribes to accurately make copies of the Scriptures.   The Jewish
               scribes conscientiously sought perfection in the transcription of the text. We know that in the Talmud,
               rigid regulations were laid down for making copies of Old Testament texts.

               1. The copyist was required to sit in full Jewish dress after a complete bathing.
               2. Only a certain kind of ink could be used.
               3. Rules governed the spacing of words.
               4. No word or letter could be written from memory.
               5. Lines and letters were methodically counted.
               6. If a manuscript was found to have even one error it was destroyed. (This helps explain why only a few
                   manuscripts survived.)
               7.  During the copying process, any two words touching each other warranted destruction of that page,
                   and the page before it (because it had touched that page).

               “This strict set of regulations which governed the early Jewish scribes is a chief factor which guarantees
               the accurate transmission of the Old Testament text” (Lightfoot, pp. 97-98).

               With the discovery of the Dead Sea Scrolls, scholars have Hebrew manuscripts one thousand years
               earlier than the great Masoretic Text manuscripts, enabling them to check on the fidelity of the Hebrew
               text. The result of comparative studies reveals that there is a word-for-word identity in more than 95
               percent of the cases, and the 5 percent variation consists mostly of slips of the pen and spelling.

               99.5% of all the manuscripts agree 100%.  That means that the copyists were careful not to change the
               text throughout the ages of time.  Also, there are really only 400 variants that affected the sense of the
               passage, and only 50 of these have doctrinal significance.   We have over 5,300 copies ancient
                                            nd
               manuscripts, some back to the 2  Century.  By comparing the various manuscripts, we can pretty much
               see when a variant was introduced and why.

               Illustration:  If we had 10 people in the room make a copy of a church constitution by hand, then
               compared them all, we would find differences, but we won’t find the same differences in all 10 copies.
               We can use the majority to check the difference.  This science is called Textual Criticism.  Translators
               today compare various ancient manuscripts and are accurately able to determine when a variant was
               introduced and what the original author wrote with a high degree of certainty.

               For an interesting video on reliability of Scripture:
               Isn’t the Bible Full of Errors?  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XZp7n3s0d6Q










                                                             38
   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44