Page 27 - AIU Distance Learning Courses - Sample
P. 27

Did Jesus or the apostles consider the writings as Scripture?  Is the book geographically and historically
               accurate?

               Five OT books were disputed by a few in the Jewish community.
               1. Song of Solomon  The school of Shammai (first. cent. A. D.), as well as some others, expressed doubt
               about the canonicity of the Song of Solomon. The basic reason was that the book seemed sensual to
               some. The view of Rabbi Akiba ben Joseph (c. A. D. 50—132), however, prevailed as is evidenced in his
               statement, “God forbid!—No man in Israel ever disputed about the Song of Songs that it does not
                                                           22
               render the hands unclean [i. e. is not canonical].“
               2. Ecclesiastes  One of the main objections to Ecclesiastes was that it was skeptical and that its talk of
               life being “vanity” was not fitting of Holy Scripture. This doubt about the book, however, is more of an
               interpretive issue than one concerning inspiration. The thrust of the book is that life lived apart from
               God is vanity. That is why at the conclusion of the book, Solomon can say, “Fear God and keep His
               commandments. . . for God will bring every act to judgment” (Eccl. 12:13-14). This book was accepted as
               canon.

               3. Esther was doubted by some because the name of God is absent from the book. People wondered
               how a book that did not mention God could be inspired. God’s sovereignty and providence, however, is
               prevalent throughout the book as He protected His people from extermination. Josephus and the
               Mishnah cite Esther as Scripture.

               4. Ezekiel  “This book was questioned by some because of its apparent anti-Mosaical teachings. The
               school of Shammai thought that the teaching of the book was not in harmony with the Mosaic law, and
               that the first ten chapters exhibited a tendency toward gnosticism” (Geisler and Nix, p. 261). However,
               no specific examples have been given to show that Ezekiel contradicts the Mosaic Law or that its
               chapters tend toward gnosticism. As Beckwith has observed, “evidence in favor of the canonicity of
               Ezekiel is so ample and so early that the book is something of an embarrassment to those who hold the
                                                                    23
               common view about the date of the closing of the canon.”
               5. Proverbs  Some claimed that Proverbs was not inspired because it supposedly contradicts itself (see
               Proverbs 26:4-5). Many rabbis, though, claimed that when interpreted correctly, Proverbs did not
               contradict itself. Support for Proverbs from the Pharisaic, Essene and Christian community strongly
               vouch for its canonicity.















               22  Norman L. Geisler & William Nix, A General Introduction to the Bible,p. 259
               23  Roger Beckwith, The Old Testament Canon in the New Testament Church and Its Background in Early Judaism, p.
               86

                                                             27
   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32