Page 18 - The Voice 2017
P. 18

IAGC SUPPORTS SEA ACT


            LEGISLATION TO OVERHAUL


            THE MMPA




               AGC momentum for greater     marine  mammals caused by
               offshore access continues    overfishing and overhunting.
           Iwith      U.S.  Congressman
            Mike    Johnson's    (LA-04)    Today,   amid    stable  and
            introduction of the Streamlining   increasing marine mammal
            Environmental Approvals Act     populations, the SEA Act will
            of 2017 (SEA Act). Introduced   provide a balanced  approach
            on 27 June, the SEA Act offers   to ensure that critical activities
            a common-sense approach to      and projects such as coastal
            correct flawed Marine Mammal    restoration, offshore energy and
            Protection Act (MMPA) of the    mineral exploration and military
            1970s.  The SEA Act addresses   operations can move forward.
            many of the inadequacies and
            misapplications of the MMPA     The      IAGC        supports
            to industries and projects for   Congressman Johnson's efforts
            which it was never designed     and appreciates his leadership
            to regulate. The MMPA was       on this crucial issue that has
            enacted to address significant   hampered exploration in the
            declines in some species of     U.S. Outer Continental Shelf.        U.S. Congressman Mike Johnson (LA-04)








            IAGC SUCCESSFULLY PROTECTS INDUSTRY'S


            RIGHT TO DEFEND PERMITTED ACTIVITY




                     ith IAGC's amicus brief  or seeking new relief, then it must  the case). A defendant-intervenor
                     in  Chester v. Laroe,  the  demonstrate standing.           would only have to demonstrate
           WU.S.            Supreme    Court                                     standing if it were filing a cross-
            declined to require standing  In its amicus brief, the IAGC  claim or counterclaim.  This
            for  a  defendant-intervenor.  The  urged  the   Court   to   avoid  decision ensures  that  industry
            Supreme Court's 5 June 2017       establishing a new rule requiring  organizations will continue to
            decision narrowly focused on the  defendant-intervenors,     which   have the opportunity to defend
            specific facts before the Court   industry stakeholders  often  are,  in court positive agency actions,
            regarding a plaintiff-intervenor's  to demonstrate standing (i.e.,  such as decisions to permit seismic
            need to establish standing and  sufficient connection to and harm  surveys,     that  are   challenged
            unsurprisingly concludes that if  from the law or action challenged to   by  environmental   advocacy
            an intervenor is raising new claims  support that party's participation in   organizations.





        18                                                                                            THE VOICE
   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23