Page 158 - (A) Mammoth (998pp)

You have always refused to confront the Leaseholders because too afraid of the difficulty of
agreeing on things which might be different from what you think. We believe this is life, when you share possessions, and it is better to face problems instead of avoiding them because sooner or later they come back to you, and this is exactly what is happening as a consequence of your behaviour over the last few months. You, as a Designer, should know you first collect your clients briefing and then you work on it to make sure your clients are satisfied with the result (you being 1 out of 9). You decided to do the opposite.
Those facts have inevitably pushed some people against you (in the recent months as well as the last years). Your sarcastic humour, jokes, personal offences, rasing of voice (last time on Thursday) need to end immediately. We really had enough of your arrogance and abuse of power.
With regards to the votes, again we believe you have misrepresented the facts given that Samya flat 4 transparently voted against preference B Belle Epoque (see her e-mail 28/05 12.33) and it is really ridiculous and unacceptable that people get pushed to change their mind after just to obtain
a majority in your favour.
You just need to let go for a wile, stop bulling people, leave them to decide on their own.
Please note that Diego is the legal owner of the Flat and therefore any formal communication should be sent to his attention, posted in the premises (as per normal practice) and sent via e- mail as courtesy to diego.fortunati@baml.com and susannagnecco@hotmail.com.
Dustbins
For the last time!!!
I do not dislike, as individual objects, the bright dustbins that you decided to buy and install. I just think they are not the appropriate choice for Mitre House (much more appropriate in a nursery, fast food or artistic environment).
Plus I was just very surprised that the Leaseholders (at least the one leaving in the building) were not consulted nor informed about something so different from what you usually expect in a period residential building. It would have been more appropriate to consider such change as part of the redecoration.
Also the old dustbins that you removed were thrown in the back yard, were they still are after many months!
Overall we are quite disappointed because we are and always been a peaceful family open to constructive dialogue with no need to raise the voice.
Diego and Susanna
On 7 June 2012 22:52:22 GMT+01:00, paul wrote:
Susanna - here is what I attempted to explain earlier - (and indeed was awaiting sending since 31st May deadline - but Michele Hillgarth would not confirm her preference) but in truth, I've no idea how else this process could have been better organised despite your extraordinary accusations as to my behaviour, attitude and non co-operation. If I've said it once, I've said it a dozen times, it doesn't matter what you or I want, it's what the majority wants - now we have that choice, based on your proposals and ours, you can fine tune those items that are not fully decided by the majority vote
This final result should have been indicated to everyone over last week-end (as I promised, along with the first of the legal Section 20 Notice) but it's late, due to Flat 5 (Michele Hillgarth) very late final choice of Preference A (although she wants Tiffany Lamps and NOT a black lift, but I'll leave you to further discuss with her when you meet at 5pm on 13 June - and I wish you luck. The tragedy of this whole project is that had you agreed with all of us as to how Mitre House should look, we'd have finished it by now...! But, alas you have a totally diametrically opposed idea of how Mitre House should be decorated and improved, and hence this very unpleasant atmosphere (the first I have ever experienced in 40 years at Mitre House) is developing at an alarming pace. You appear to either misunderstand or misinterpret my comments, motives and modus operandi. You have no idea of what we old tenants experienced from Agents in the past - no consultation whatsoever, a huge, enormous cost and a thoroughly unpleasant decor.
I also enclose an outline of how people voted in each section based on their comments (as far as I could follow, but mistakes could have been made by me in correctly interpreting their comments) which you were also copied via email (I hope).
And yes, despite your extraordinary comment that Lisa's opinions should not be included, which as I said is simply not acceptable as she has lived here, as her home, for 15 years and has far more say over how Mitre House should look than new tenants and certainly those who sub-let their flats I can assure you. Anyway, as you will see from my very fair outline, although Lisa's comments are included in the Final Overall Vote, there is still a majority vote