Page 92 - (A) Mammoth (998pp)

homework in finding out ALL the legal requirements and necessi>es H all of which you have
received from the start of this process but obviously have not bothered to do what Jamil, Segar and I have done which is to read everything, twice, and do as required H just a glance at the first three quarters demands will a`est to that fact H they are all 100% correct, legal and although I say it myself, quite a`rac>ve! As indeed is (was) the first of the Sec>on 20's ready to send out H check your files to see exactly what KFH sent out with their demands and Sec>on 20's H if you can find a full stop out of place or indeed a comma H let me know.
OK H end of Michele's queries H now Flat 9's comments and requests H regret that all your ideas, Diego, are not acceptable H we certainly will not voluntarily step aside I can assure you H you must take ma`ers into your own hands with the others and make suitable alterna>ve arrangements as laid down in law which you are all en>tled to do. On a successful applica>on to LVT, Mitre House Management Limited would not be the authority to appoint Agents as you wish, you would be.
Dear Michele,
Thanks for your suggestion of a third party managing agent.
We believe it was already unanimously agreed by all attendees to the leaseholders’ meeting on June
13th, representing flat 3, 4, 5, 8 and 9 (5 out of 9 flats), that we were all in favour of a third party managing agent to replace the existing Mitre House Management Limited.
As such, we believe, the best solution would be for Mitre House Management Limited to voluntary step back and appoint Best Gapp to manage the building on behalf of all the leaseholders, having no specific vested interest in the property.
We also believe it is a good news that they will be prepared to do it without charging a fee for arranging the quotes for the internal refurbishment, thanks to the work done so far, which will result in a significant saving for all leaseholders.
Furthermore, by seeing some of the recent exchange of e-mails, we believe that having professional advice on Electrical Certificate, Fire regulations, Insurance etc is of paramount importance because if the management company fails on any of these matters and an accident occurs in the block, there is a possibility that the block won’t be covered by insurance and the directors of the management company will be legally responsible for that, causing further disruptions.
One last point we would like to have an answer on - and maybe Paul or the other Directors can help here - is with regards to the rubbish that has been dumped in the backyard of the building (see attached pictures taken today). In particular we would like to know:

Yes, with apologies to one and all re: rubbish -

It is scheduled to be removed on 14th July simply awaiting a few final bits and pieces from Flat 2's extensive renovation - along with the old discarded dustbins. Flat 2 is paying obviously.

It might come as a surprise, but all recent renovations, including Flats, 9, 5, 1 and 3 have ALL utilised this rear yard for the same purpose when their premises were modernised, refurbished etc - normal practice. But again, apologies, although Susanna was advised by me some time ago that indeed it would all soon go along with the old dustbins....

1. Who put the construction rubbish there as opposed to pay the builders to remove it as part of the refurbishment works? Believe the last flat refurbished was n. 2, does that rubbish belong to Flat 2? If not, who does that belong to given we're all copied here?
2. Who authorised the use of that common part as deposit for construction rubbish and refuse coming