Page 784 - Area X - H

4
2. Faith b* U jf - in r v f c jv . fcvvyvvw
4 - Very satisfactory Satisfactory Satisfactory " r
&
3. Integrity fvvvvJS'*^ (
3 - Satisfactory Satisfactory Satisfactory r
4. Service 4
2 - Poor Satisfactory Satisfactory . r
5. Creativity
1 -Very Poor Satisfactory Satisfactory
VAM-w 'irC K*-
6. Cultural-Sensitivity
Satisfactory Satisfactory h r
Semi-Annual Assessment
January to June July to December
Functions Score W»ighM Functions Scorn Weighted
(6) (? ).... .................. _
1. Functions: (90%) II. Functions: (90%)
A. Designation (OPCR rating) A. Designation (OPCR rating) TW
B. Faculty Functions Rating Faculty Functions Rating
, Add: Common Indicators score Add: Common Indicators score r r r
Total Score Total Score d .
Divide by: No. of PI Divide by: No, of PI k ? n
Average/Welghted (70%) Average/Welghted (70%) U 7T T
Student Rating/Weighted (30%) Student Rating/Weighted (30%) 4 ' 5 ^
Rating Scale for the Final Score; Total (Average-Faculty+Student Rating) Average-Faculty+Student Rating)
4.51 - 5.00 - Outstanding (Extraordinary level o f achievement) Rating for Part 1(67%A+33%B) Rating for Part I (67%A+33%B)

3.51 - 4.50 — Very Satisfactory (Performance exceeded expectation)
2-51 - 3.50 — Satisfactory (Performance met expectation) II. Behavioral Indicators (10%) II. Behavioral Indicators (10%)
1.51 - 2.50 .......Fair (Performance failed to meet expectation) Total Score - Behavioral Indicators Total Score - Behavioral Indicators 3 0
1.00 - 1.50 -----Poor (Performance was consisteriUy below expectation)
No. of Pi No. of PI Jr*
b
Rating for Part II (T. Score/ PI) Rating for Part II (T. Score/ PI)
IPCR Rating (90% Part 1+10% Part II) IPCR Rating (90% Part 1+10% Part li) “ 'T
L L . 1 L L -
^
Adjectival Rating Adjectival Rating
Discussed rating with: Discussed rating with:
I. % weight allocation for faculty members:
Instructor Asst Prof. Amo. Prof Prof. Unlv. Prof
1. Instruction 80% 70% 50% 35% 30% HILDA N^IMMAN.GPm.P.h.-D
2. Research 10% 10% 20% 40% 45% Employee
3. Extension 5%* 10%* 10%* 10%* 10%*
4. Production - 5%* 10%* $%* 5%*
5. Others 5%* 5%* 30%* 10%* 10%* Assessed by: Assessed by:
I certify that I discussed my assessment I certify that I discussed my assei
II. For faculty members with designation, % weight allocation shall be pro-rated based on approved workload,
of the performance with the employee. of the performance with the em,
HILDA.N. IMMANGDUL, Ph.D Hiua IANGDUL. Ph.D
Immediate Supervisor lmm< | Supervisor
Final rating by: Final rating by:
I,/
NELSONS. LATAE.Ph.p,. SERAFIN M f A Y O N , Ph.D.
________________Head of Delivery Unit Head of tMiivery Unit