Page 702 - Area X - G

Semi-Annual Assessment
Comments and Recommendations for Individual Development Purposes
January to June July tc December
~Weig vve/
Functions Score Functions Score
JhtacL. nhtf.i
(7.
^ (>^jv^ V ua/ *•*- '"AggAnrf I. Functions: (90%) . Functions: (90%)
A Designation (OPCR rating) A Designation ;OPCR rating)
B Faculty Functions Rating B Faculty Functions Rating
Add Common Indicators sc Add Common Indicators sci
Total Score Total Score
Divide by No. of PI Divide by No of PI
AverageWeighted (70%) AverageAVeighted (70%)
Student Rating/Weighted (30%) Student Rating/Weighted (30%)
Total (Average-F acuity t-Stu Total (Average-f acuity+Stui /j.
Rating Scale for the Final Score:
4.51 - 5.00 ---- Outstanding (KxtrsVtrdmary level ot itchievenent) Rating for Part I (67% A-t-33< : Rating for Part I (67% A +333 tftf]]
3.51 4.5o ...- Veer Satisfactory (Performance raettsk-d esptetatton) II. Behavioral Indicators (10%) II. Behavioral Indicators (10%)
2t5t 3.50 - Satisfactory <Pwformaiice met expectation) Total Score - Behavioral Inc Total Score - Behavioral Ind
1.51 - >.50 - Pair (Performance fatted to meet expectation'.
|, 0 (i 1.30 Poor tPcrf -rmancewas consistently below expectation; No. of P! No of PI
Rating for Part II (T S core/ Rating for Part II (T Score/1
F C R RaTin'g i^RTOT'afTTT'IWo 'F P C R Rating TgO ^ P a r n T T O C T
Note: %weight allocation for the functions of faculty membtrs shall be based on the existing policies on faculty 'Adjectival Rating Adjectival Rating

Discussed rating with, Discussed rating
t. % weight altocstion for faculty members: IMELDAG GUYON
In stru cto r 4sst Prof. Ass o. P o f. P rof. U niu. Prof. Employee
1 . instruction 80% 70% SO% 35% 30%
2. Research 1 0 % 1 0 % 2 0 % 40% 45% Assessed by: Assessed by.
3, Extension 5%* 1 0 %* 1 0 % ' 1 0 %* 1 Q%*
4. Production 5%‘ io%- S%‘ 5%* I certify that l discusse d m y a sse ssm ent I certify that I d is c u s s #
5. Others 5%* S%* 1 0 % ' 1 0 %" 1 0 %» of the performance with the employee cf the perfopnafceygfth !

II For fscuty members with designation, % weight allocation shallbe pro-rated based on approved workload.
N E LS O N S LATAP PhD
Immediate Supervisor
Final rating by,

JO C E LY N T SALV1EJO
Head o f D elivery Unit
IFS U -H R O -P M T -F 0 32
Rev OQiFeb 0 4 .2 0 1 9 )