Page 244 - Теория кавитации

introduced the concept of particles - elementary and not only cavitions of the four types
ci1, ci2, ci3 and ci4. “Cavition” (formed from the combination of the words
“CAVITation” and “IONization”) is a neologism from cavitation, introduced for the
study, first of all, of electrical and magnetic phenomena in nature and in artificial
processes [19]-[20].

Note. So far, the aforementioned concepts, phenomena associated with the electron
have been explained differently, only - without cavitation. However, the scheme that we
offer as a new approach to this is much different from the existing ones, and it is most
natural. Now let's focus on the phenomenon of magnetism. Although this phenomenon
has been thoroughly studied for seven centuries by physicists such as Pierre de Maricour
(1269: “A Letter of a Magnet”), William Gilbert (1600: “About Magnets, Magnetic
Bodies, and a Large Magnetic Earth”), Otto von Gericke, Oersted Hans Christian (1813,
1820), André-Marie Ampère, Maria Skladovskaya-Curie, Choir Charle D'Anga (1785),
Michael Faraday (1821-1831, 1864), James Maxwell (1873: “A Treatise on Electricity
and Magnetism”), Bio and Savar, Om, Lenz, Gauss, Joule, Thomson, Nikola Tesla and
others [22], but it is still impossible to say with certainty that this phenomenon has
revealed all its secrets.

The question of whether there is an elementary particle, for example, “monopole”,
i.e. the element that generates magnetism, like electron - electricity, is still the subject
of research on magnetic phenomena. Scientists occasionally attempting to search for
such a particle, agreed on the failure of such devices, because, although hypothetically,
some scientists are convinced that “yes, there is such a particle!”.
But no experiment has confirmed their theoretical statements and proofs. One of
these ideas is given in the analytical review [23]. K.W. Ford, J.N. Bakell, D. Larson and
other physicists tried to find a magnetic monopole, considering the three-dimensional
representation of an imaginary particle in projections on one-dimensional and two-
dimensional planes, but P.O. Bruce argues that their attempts are groundless, and this
analysis shows that Richard Feynman, the author of fundamental textbooks covering the
most important branches of physics, was right in criticizing the ideas of scientists [23].
Thus, no one can believe that the search for a magnetic monopole can give real results,
although there is no shortage of time spent or ideas put forward by scientists.

243