Page 383 - Magistrates Conference 2019
P. 383

books which he declares to be the authority on the foreign law in question, and those books the
               court, having received all the necessary explanations from the expert may construe for itself. 153


               It is the duty of the judge to decide whether the skill of any person whose opinion is offered is
               sufficient to entitle him to be considered as an expert. 154


               The expert’s opinion as to the existence of the facts on which his opinion is given is inadmissible
               unless he perceived them himself. 155


               Where a fact though inadmissible in evidence, may, with the judge’s permission, be proved if it
               supports or is inconsistent with the opinion of the expert when that opinion is admissible. 156

               Where there is a question as to the person who wrote or signed any document, the opinion of any

               person acquainted with the handwriting of the  supposed writer it was or was not written or

               signed by him is admissible in evidence. Any comparison of a disputed writing with any writing
               proved to the satisfaction of the judge, to be genuine may be submitted as evidence along with

               the evidence of the witnesses respecting them. 157

               Where the opinion of any living person is admissible in evidence, the  grounds on which the

               opinion is based are also admissible. 158

               Jamaica


               The  current legal position in relation to reliability of the expert  evidence is that the  expert
               evidence in question must be sufficiently well established to pass the ordinary test of relevance

               and reliability, that is to say, it must be sufficiently reliable to be suitable for a jury to understand
               and consider.  It must be noted however, that  because questions of fact are within the sole

               purview of the tribunal of fact (the Parish Court Judge), it is open to the jury to reject the opinion
               of an expert and draw  their own conclusions bearing in mind the evidence of the case:  R v

               Carletto Linton and Others 159




               153  Guyana – Evidence Act Cap. 5:03, section 16(4)
               154  Guyana – Evidence Act Cap. 5:03, section 16(5)
               155  Guyana – Evidence Act Cap. 5:03, section 16(6)
               156  Guyana – Evidence Act Cap. 5:03, section 17
               157  Guyana – Evidence Act Cap. 5:03, sections 18(1)(2), 19
               158  Guyana – Evidence Act Cap. 5:03, sections 18(1)(2), 20
               159  SCCA Nos. 3, 4, 5 of 2000
                                                                                                           45
   378   379   380   381   382   383   384   385   386   387   388