Page 406 - Magistrates Conference 2019
P. 406

(d) it is relevant to an important matter in issue between the accused and the prosecution;

               (e)  it has substantial probative value in relation to an important matter in issue between the

               accused and a co-accused;

               (f) it is evidence to correct a false impression given by the accused;

               (g) the accused has made an attack on another person’s character. 253




               The Court shall not admit evidence under subsection (1) if, on an application by the accused to

               exclude it, it appears to the Court that the admission of the evidence would have such an adverse
               effect on the fairness of the proceedings that the Court ought not to admit it. 254


                On an application to exclude evidence under  subsection (3) the Court shall  have regard, in
               particular, to  the length of time between the  matters to which that evidence  relates  and the

               matters which form the subject of the offence charged. 255

               R v Hunter 256  has placed important limitations on the extent to which evidence of defendant’s

               good character must be taken into account by the tribunal of fact. Though it was a consolidated
               appeal arising from the assizes, the principles are equally  applicable in the summary

               jurisdiction. The key shift in jurisprudence cemented by this decision is that the failure to take

               into account good character evidence will not inevitably lead to the quashing of a conviction
               on appeal. Where an appellant with a spurious claim to good character, or in instances where

               good character evidence is of little weight in the context of the case as a whole,  judges are no
               longer obliged to give good character directions which will be meaningless or absurd. In the

               summary jurisdiction,  much will turn on the  facts of the case, and  whether good character
               evidence is evident from the record. It is, however, undoubtedly  good practice for a  sitting

               Magistrate to enquire whether there may be any character evidence that may be beneficial to



               253
                  Trinidad and Tobago – Evidence Act. Chap 7.02, section 15N(1); See also sections 15O – 15S which define and explain the
               parameters of the gateways of section 15N.
               254  Trinidad and Tobago – Evidence Act. Chap 7.02, section 15N(3)
               255  Trinidad and Tobago – Evidence Act. Chap 7.02, section 15N(4); See also Trinidad and Tobago Criminal Bench Book 2015
               Chapters 13 - 14
               256  [2015] EWCA Crim 631

                                                                                                           68
   401   402   403   404   405   406   407   408   409   410   411