Page 292 - Magistrates Conference 2019
P. 292

contiguous zone beyond the territorial sea of a State. Notably, in the region, article 33(1)(a) has
                                                                        1
               been widely incorporated into the domestic law of nations.
                  Further, the unique jurisdictional position of Customs law has also been widely encapsulated
                                                                                                        2
               in the following provision, which is identical in Guyana, Jamaica and Trinidad and Tobago  and
                                                                  3
               exists with modifications in other Caribbean nations :

                              “Every offence under the Customs laws shall be deemed to have been committed

                              and every cause of complaint to have arisen either in the place in which it actually

                              was committed or arose, or in any place on land where the offender or person
                              prosecuted may be or is brought.”


               In Fedna Stoll v. J D’Olivieria (1968) 13 WIR 204, the Supreme Court of Guyana considered the

               equivalent of section 258 of the Customs Act. At page 209 of Fedna Stoll, Bollers CJ opined
               that:



                         “By its very terms [s 258] is framed in the alternative. The reason for this is obvious.
                         It precludes a defendant from questioning the magistrate's jurisdiction if, for the sake

                         of convenience, he is apprehended within the territorial waters off the shores of the
                         boundaries of one jurisdiction and is taken to, for example, a port situate in another

                         jurisdiction.


                         Section [258]  in effect, gives the Comptroller of Customs an  election as to the

               1   See  Antigua and  Barbuda: Section 6(2) of the Territorial Waters Act  No. 18 of 1982,  the  Bahamas:
               Section 9(1)(c) of the Archipelagic Waters and Maritime Jurisdiction Act, Barbados: Section 20(1)(e) of
               the  Marine  Boundaries  and  Jurisdiction  Act  Cap  387,  Dominica:  Section  2  of  the  Territorial  Sea,
               Contiguous Zone, Exclusive Economic and Fishery Zones Act Cap 1.11, Grenada: Section 9(3) of the
               Territorial Sea and Maritime Boundaries Act No.17 of 1978, Guyana: Section 19(1) of the Maritime Zones
               Act CAP 63:01, Jamaica: Section 20(1) of the Maritime Areas Act 25 of 1996, St. Kitts and Nevis: Section
               11 of the Maritime Areas  Act No.3  of 1984,  St. Lucia: Section  11 of the Maritime Areas Act 1984, St.
               Vincent and  the Grenadines: Section  19(a)  of the Maritime Areas  Act 1983  and Trinidad and Tobago:
               Section 6A of the Territorial Sea Act Chap 1:51
               2  See Guyana: Section  261 of the Customs Act Chap 82:01, Jamaica: Section 245 of the Customs Act
               and Trinidad and Tobago: Section 251 of the Customs Act Chap 78:01
               3  See Antigua and Barbuda: Section 220 of the Customs (Control and Management) Act 2013, Dominica:
               Section 235 of the Customs Act 20 of 2010, Grenada: Section 226 of the Customs Act 9 of 2015 and St.
               Kitts and Nevis: section 231 of the Customs Act 19 of 2014. Interestingly, in Barbados (see section 217 of
               the Customs Act  Cap 66),  it would appear that the substitution of the  word “offence” with the  words
               “cause of action” is meant to confine the provision to civil proceedings

                                                                                                  Page 2 of 21
   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297