Page 384 - Magistrates Conference 2019 
        P. 384
     books which he declares to be the authority on the foreign law in question, and those books the
               court, having received all the necessary explanations from the expert may construe for itself. 153
               It is the duty of the judge to decide whether the skill of any person whose opinion is offered is
               sufficient to entitle him to be considered as an expert. 154
               The expert’s opinion as to the existence of the facts on which his opinion is given is inadmissible
               unless he perceived them himself. 155
               Where a fact though inadmissible in evidence, may, with the judge’s permission, be proved if it
               supports or is inconsistent with the opinion of the expert when that opinion is admissible. 156
               Where there is a question as to the person who wrote or signed any document, the opinion of any
               person acquainted with the handwriting of the  supposed writer it was or was not written or
               signed by him is admissible in evidence. Any comparison of a disputed writing with any writing
               proved to the satisfaction of the judge, to be genuine may be submitted as evidence along with
               the evidence of the witnesses respecting them. 157
               Where the opinion of any living person is admissible in evidence, the  grounds on which the
               opinion is based are also admissible. 158
               Jamaica
               The  current legal position in relation to reliability of the expert  evidence is that the  expert
               evidence in question must be sufficiently well established to pass the ordinary test of relevance
               and reliability, that is to say, it must be sufficiently reliable to be suitable for a jury to understand
               and consider.  It must be noted however, that  because questions of fact are within the sole
               purview of the tribunal of fact (the Parish Court Judge), it is open to the jury to reject the opinion
               of an expert and draw  their own conclusions bearing in mind the evidence of the case:  R v
               Carletto Linton and Others 159
               153  Guyana – Evidence Act Cap. 5:03, section 16(4)
               154  Guyana – Evidence Act Cap. 5:03, section 16(5)
               155  Guyana – Evidence Act Cap. 5:03, section 16(6)
               156  Guyana – Evidence Act Cap. 5:03, section 17
               157  Guyana – Evidence Act Cap. 5:03, sections 18(1)(2), 19
               158  Guyana – Evidence Act Cap. 5:03, sections 18(1)(2), 20
               159  SCCA Nos. 3, 4, 5 of 2000
                                                                                                           45





