Page 7 - Risk Reduction Series - Documentation Essentials (Part Two)
P. 7

SVMIC Risk Reduction Series: Documentation Essentials


                   It is well-established that patients have the legal right to

                   sufficient information with which to make an informed decision
                   as to the course of their medical treatment. Additionally, AMA

                   Code of Medical Ethics Opinion 2.1.1  sets forth the obligation of
                                                                    1
                   a physician to give a patient adequate information so that he or

                   she may exercise effectively a right of self-decision. Engage in a
                   full and clear discussion with patients about the nature of their

                   medical condition, the recommended treatment plan, and the
                   risks, benefits, and alternatives. Doing so not only discharges

                   your legal and ethical obligation to provide patients with
                   sufficient information with which to make an educated election

                   about the course of their medical care but may also help create
                   realistic expectations on the patient’s part as to the outcome

                   of treatment. Be careful not to educate above a patient’s
                   comprehension level. Be sure the details of all discussions

                   with patients are documented in your office record rather than
                   relying on hospital consent forms that are not procedure-

                   specific and may not capture all details of the conversation.
                   Remember, obtaining informed consent is a non-delegable duty.

                   The responsibility for ensuring that an informed consent form
                   is properly completed and signed by the patient rests with the

                   physician performing the procedure or administering treatment.



                   Documentation issues are a factor in the majority of claims paid
                   in general surgery. Often, medical record notes simply reflect

                   “risks and benefits discussed” without any documentation of the
                   procedure-specific risks and benefits, and no further indication

                   that alternatives and expected outcomes were likewise
                   discussed.  When a known complication occurred, the failure of

                   the record to reflect that the procedure-specific risks, benefits,
                   and alternatives were thoroughly reviewed opened the door for



                   1      https://www.ama-assn.org/sites/default/files/media-browser/code-of-medical-ethics-
                          chapter-2.pdf
                                                           Page 7
   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12